The recent Alberta “zero isolate” court case, the Drosten PCR test being based on computer modelling and not organic isolate, the 20 year patent investigations, the lab leak smokescreen, the jabs being developed - both mRNA and adenovirus - without the use of any organic isolate, and the obvious data fudging, plausible deniability and perverse incentives across the board, are all glaring examples well thrashed out by this community. To suggest otherwise is disingenuous. However, even those scientists and lawyers and professionals who speak out about these and all other aspects of the scamdemic at great personal risk - and we all know who those heroes and heroines are and the topics they cover - must also be doing so in full knowledge that it is an elaborate behavioural psyop, since they will see the scientific evidence (or lack thereof) up close, as well as the regulatory capture and institutional corruption. Speaking out about shoddy science and corruption is one thing; dismissing a virus’ existence is quite something else, in the same camp as saying the election was stolen, the jabs are a bioweapon, imposing global communism is under way etc. It would be heresy and professional suicide, that would render one’s other legit arguments as ridiculous. What we have, therefore, is likely more akin to mass hysteria or hypnosis, where everyone is “in on it” in conscious and unconscious ways, for different reasons, engineered by powerful people with control of powerful networks, rather than being down to individual ignorance, or low spectrum thinking, which it seems you may be implying.
One thing, I was not referring to the entire community. I have read many great posts that are very informative and spot on. With that being said, I was merely stating that I see a ton of people who still believe it's real, and it is pretty easy to write off the existence of an illness when it shares nearly every symptom with other illnesses and you cannot test for it. I would think the burden of proof would lie with those claiming it does exist. Still appreciate your feedback and we'll written response! Thanks!
The recent Alberta “zero isolate” court case, the Drosten PCR test being based on computer modelling and not organic isolate, the 20 year patent investigations, the lab leak smokescreen, the jabs being developed - both mRNA and adenovirus - without the use of any organic isolate, and the obvious data fudging, plausible deniability and perverse incentives across the board, are all glaring examples well thrashed out by this community. To suggest otherwise is disingenuous. However, even those scientists and lawyers and professionals who speak out about these and all other aspects of the scamdemic at great personal risk - and we all know who those heroes and heroines are and the topics they cover - must also be doing so in full knowledge that it is an elaborate behavioural psyop, since they will see the scientific evidence (or lack thereof) up close, as well as the regulatory capture and institutional corruption. Speaking out about shoddy science and corruption is one thing; dismissing a virus’ existence is quite something else, in the same camp as saying the election was stolen, the jabs are a bioweapon, imposing global communism is under way etc. It would be heresy and professional suicide, that would render one’s other legit arguments as ridiculous. What we have, therefore, is likely more akin to mass hysteria or hypnosis, where everyone is “in on it” in conscious and unconscious ways, for different reasons, engineered by powerful people with control of powerful networks, rather than being down to individual ignorance, or low spectrum thinking, which it seems you may be implying.
One thing, I was not referring to the entire community. I have read many great posts that are very informative and spot on. With that being said, I was merely stating that I see a ton of people who still believe it's real, and it is pretty easy to write off the existence of an illness when it shares nearly every symptom with other illnesses and you cannot test for it. I would think the burden of proof would lie with those claiming it does exist. Still appreciate your feedback and we'll written response! Thanks!