From what I can gather, the average suvivability of covid is commonly known as 99.7% of all age groups. Can you break it down for me on how they are calculating 99.7% from the official numbers of the cdc?
Thanks.
Edit: Is this correct, deaths/cases x 100?
From cdc, currently, 37,259,886 cases 623,244 deaths.
But I am getting 1.6%, that's 98.33% (maybe 99.7% was calc from previous numbers if someone knows?).
Sidenote, we all know the actual death is 5.5% of the covid deaths they report.
Pretty easy in Australia, just look at the government's own website at respiratory deaths: they were lower in 2020 and in 2021 they are exactly the same as the previous 5 years. So no extra people died. Which means there is no new pathogen, impossible, since it would have increased the deaths. There is no pandemic. So Covid doesn't exist.
https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/causes-death/provisional-mortality-statistics/jan-2020-apr-2021
See here for one study, placing the mortality rate as ~0.15%, averaged over all age groups:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12iN7ImhT0/new-study-suggests-that-covid19-/
Not sure whether they subtracted out the flu deaths. They did remove the lockdown-related deaths (e.g., suicides, overdoses, etc.).
Further, there was the CDC report that ~96% of people of "COVID deaths" were people who had > 2.5 co-morbidities (i.e., they didn't die of COVID, just with it).
The effectiveness of Ivermectin/Fluvoxamine/HCQ/etc. (see others here) is 70-90% or so, when taken early.
So, in a sane world, where COVID treatments were easily available, the true mortality rate would be:
0.15% * 4% (removing co-morbities) * 30% (using a conservative estimate for those who would die even with one treatment) = 0.0018%.
That may or may not account for the removal of flu deaths.
That doesn't take into account that in a sane world, the doctor would use as many treatments as needed to save the patient (Dr. Flemming has done this for instance, and in a trial he only lost one patient out of dozens or hundreds, by using a mix-bag of treatments).
And that does not take into account the fact that in a sane world we would also be promoting vitamin D for nearly everyone.
The most recent data from Norway suggests .05% - .2% mortality IFR... it varies greatly (orders of magnitude) by age and comorbidity though. It actually does have IFR very similar to the flu after this latest variant. It will keep dropping over time and becoming more contagious.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0nAqgQafhQ
Survivability is 100% because it doesn't exist. The tests for it are fake. The statistics are fake. The virus was never isolated. They lie about everything.
How would you calculate it?
Deaths/Cases x 100?
Have you tried your formula with the numbers to see if it matches?
To date from cdc:
37,259,886 cases
623,244 deaths
Yes, I get 1.6% so it isnt 0.3% that's why I asked
It could potentially be lower when you account for the only 5-6% of cases actually died of covid vs with covid. Meaning someone who was terminal in a hospice gets covid and dies, that's counted as a covid death. I think at least for a while it was anyone who died within 28 days of having covid. Very few people actually died of covid and nothing else. Comorbidities and all that.
Ultimately the number doesn't really matter so much as the simple fact that it has an overall very high survivability rate, which calls into question the entire thing.
The percentage of survivors who read this is even higher than that.
Not trusting any of those numbers, sry. Don't know anyone who's died from it. I'm sure they're out there, but I have absolutely zero reason to trust anything coming out of the news rn
The cdc did state that only 5.5% died from covid so yes the numbers they give us are fake.