It's convenient to provide direct and unrefutable sauce but, I don't think it's right to knock someone who is doing what he can to inform the community if it's not perfect for everyone. I mean....most 'irrefutable' evidence is still subjective in the end anyhow. I'd rather push someone to post what they have so we can all see then not post because it wasn't approved by 3 supreme court justices, wasn't backed up by Scavino, wasn't written in Jefferson's memoirs (only in a signed 1st edition of course) etc. I'm being facetious haha but no, please don't demoralize those who aren't as perfect as we'd like them to be thereby decreasing people's desire to post for fear of being criticized. We want all info that isn't obviously fake or intentionally disinfo! IMHO ;)