Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

74
Rasmussen fudging the numbers? Biden is only ONE point lower than two weeks ago, before the surrender to the Taliban (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 4 years ago by p8riot 4 years ago by p8riot +74 / -0
19 comments download share
19 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (19)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– P900 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

I don’t know who they expect to believe these fantasy numbers! He was already at zero before that! No one in their right mind could approve him at all.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Meme_war_ii_vet 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Stop! I know these guys and these are the numbers. The problem is that they weight their polls based on election outcomes. You have to if you want to be an 'accurate pollster.' Rasmussen weights to D+2 for likely voters but we all know their's probably 6 to 7 points of built in Democrat fraud. So knock that 46 down to say 41. Then I'm sorry, the truth is 41 percent of america are retarded Kool aid drinkers or commies.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– BasedInFact 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

They literally make up the results that they want.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– p8riot [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Normally I'd agree with you. But Rasmussen has been held in high regard by the .WIN community since they gave the most accurate Trump polls back when everyone else had him down by double digits prior to the election. So this is disheartening.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Tree_Frog 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Assuming that Rasmussen has maintained a stable sampling methodology, I think what's going on here is that there's a fairly limited hardcore group of "true believers," who won't change their minds for anything. (Bet they all have 2 & 3 vaxxs too!) It's comforting to see a significantly larger group who are really hating on Ole Joe. The people who are in the center ("approve," "disapprove," and "don't know") are probably quite whishy-washy about things in the outside world and will change their minds fairly easily.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– p8riot [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Right, there's about 25% who don't feel strongly either way, so I guess I'm expecting more of them to jump on "strongly disapprove" after the Taliban debacle but it doesn't look like ANY did.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Tree_Frog 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Guess we'll have to wait for a different "precipice event" for the brain-fogged middle. Ten days of darkness with no cell phones might do the trick!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– p8riot [S] 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

No cell phones / no internet = no polls! :)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BasedInFact 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Huh?

Rasmussen went from outrageously lying about Joe Biden's "lead" to merely massively lying about it.

https://thepatriotjournal.com/final-2020-rasmussen-poll-trump/

These ain't independent and honest pollsters, that's for damned sure.

Gosh, nice try, tho. 🤷‍♂️

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– p8riot [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Nice try for what? It is widely speculated that people weren't honest when asked because they feared ending up on some list as Trump supporters.

  1. Can you name a more accurate poll prior to the election? and

  2. Can you recommend a better daily presidential poll, or one that's as independent as possible?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BasedInFact 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

The plain and obvious point is that Rasmussen was also corrupted, and false. I have no idea how you think pointing out that they happened to be the least false at one point in time is going to carry any rhetorical weight.

Fox News was notably more favorite to conservatives than the other major news outlets through the election season. Are they trustworthy? Are they honest? Are they independent?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– p8riot [S] 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Obviously I made this post because I'm unhappy with them. I'd like to replace them if possible as I like tracking this sort of thing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BasedInFact 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Fair enough. Thank you for clarifying your intent. I fully share this interest in tracking the public's collective turning away from Joe and the lies; however I'm afraid that any organization publicly collecting, analyzing, and reporting that date is either untrustworthy, or incompetent.

Yes, I too would love to see accurate numbers that might give a proxy to speed at which the people afe "waking up", but that's going to be difficult. Because not only were their starting Approval numbers absolutely bogus, but as you pointed out, that almost-zero Approval delta over one of the most outrageously damning weeks an American president has ever had is just so stupidly beyond belief.

Cheers, fren.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– HillaryTrafficsKidz 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Bullshit

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 50StateLandslide 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Fairly certain this is correct. From what I understand, the only category in which Biden has positive numbers (above 50%) is in how Covid has been handled. Most of that perception is from the MSM circlejerking over vaccine distribution and how everything is going so much better under Biden. That will definitely start to tank as Biden is forced to side with teacher's unions on forced masks and vax for kids

The 46 percent number is a little deceiving, but if you look at the strongly approve/strongly disapprove, it paints a much clearer picture. Only a quarter of the country thinks Biden is doing well. His approval index is -18, which shows that he's in a freefall, and lost about half of his base.

They had another poll earlier in the year that said if the election were held today, 45 percent of people would've voted for Biden and Trump respectively. A week ago, they conducted the same poll, and Trump was at 43, and Biden 37. Independents and his base have been consistently losing support

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– p8riot [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

It's at -21 today so I take it back, maybe the reporting is on a slight delay

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– p8riot [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

SOURCE https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/biden_administration/biden_approval_index_history

permalink save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy