Because I go to GAW to get info . And it's all bullshit because the normies arent talking about it. Says no one is talking about election fraud or audits and her facebook and youtube dont even mention it. Lets give her some legit linked up proof that we are the majority! WWG1WGA
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
I'm a self-described normie, so perhaps I can shed some light on what she is implying.. It doesn't have to do with the public perception of GAW, or that normies aren't talking about it. It's that the information being presented here is not convincing to normies.
True, but not for the reason you think.
There are several types of "truth" and/or "proof":
Most of us have outsourced parts of our lives in some way or another. For example, we use Google Maps instead of regular maps.
Normies have mostly outsourced control of their worldview when it comes to societal issues - politics, economics, science, health.
It's boring. It's technical. Why bother?
Normies have done the logical thing, which is to rely on experts and popular opinion. This is USUALLY a great solution - it gets you 80% of what you need at very little cost.
The problem is when those forms of truth get hacked. At this point, anybody who has been using those crutches are now compromised, and they don't even realize it. It's painfully obvious to anyone who uses other forms of truth, but not to the normies. Not until they wake up.
So yes, normies don't find out information convincing...because they only know how to use credibility and social acceptance as a gauge of truth.
They only way out of this is to be exposed to contrary information repeatedly to experience peer pressure from the other side.
Congratulations for finding this board, assuming you're not a shill. This is a great place to wake up if you hang around for a while and keep consuming info. Over time you'll be exposed to things that will "hit home" and reshape you're beliefs.
I mean, that’s painting with a broad brush, and with a large swath of incredibly complex people.
Anyway, I will just focus on a couple of your points.
Indeed, information can be “hacked” and biased. It is my opinion, and the view of other normies, that all truth can be hacked, including online sources. Online information can be manipulated (blogs, videos, social media posts), and the sources themselves can be misled. I could make a video right now about how Biden is actually from the Ukraine, and plenty of people would take my word for it because they already dislike Biden, and I'm feeding their confirmation bias.
Personally, I’m more of a logical thinker, and similarly, people in the medical world tend to rely on hard sciences. The reason I have not been convinced by the information here is that it is all non-falsifiable (vs. falsifiable). Meaning that anything that is unknown will be blamed on it being “secret” or deliberately hidden (Deep State, The Plan, etc), instead of it just not existing.
I think you are agreeing with me?
I'll say it differently. You need to source a ton of info to train your pattern recognition. A lot of the info you read will be wrong, true, but it will give you perspective.
Think of this process as the scientific method. You won't be able to find the truth. You can only learn to identify more and more lies.
If you're pulling in lots of info, it will allow you to start seeing broken patterns in the official narrative. You won't be able to do this by reading acceptable information sources, because those have been curated.
Most of the information here is partially accurate at best. But what you'll find is that the mainstream info is also partially accurate at best. The only difference is we're trained to be skeptical of one and trained to accept the other. Not just the info itself, but the methodology behind it (ex: falsifiability).
Once you wade through enough nonsense, you will achieve a level of accuracy and "falsifiability." But its different than the standard way we think about it.
You will be able to predict events to some degree.
Example: There will be a domestic terror incident. You will be able to predict the perpetrator and also predict the media response (which doesn't match).
Example: You will read a statistical report and get a sense for which numbers have been gamed. If you dig deep, you can verify this gut feel in most cases.
This is a numbers game. We're using statistics. You may be wrong some of the time, but once you've been right 10, 20, 50 times it all becomes very predictable.
Just remember, you can't use straight logic or "facts" to do this, because those have been hacked. You must build your awareness of alt forms of information. This trains your intuition to wake up to new patterns that you were previously unaware of, which allows you to spot false info better, although the levels here are so deep that I doubt anybody knows what's actually happening.
Again, welcome to the forum!
Thanks.
If the Q-universe never trusts logic or facts, then it implies that everything has a hidden meaning, which is only true for some slices of life, and certainly not ALL of it. This also has consequences. When the matter-of-fact parts of life, like hard sciences, are ignored or doubted it tangibly hurts people. I just think life is more intricate and subtle than "The Plan," Trump returns, good guys vs. bad guys movie plot.