A groundbreaking preprint paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published Aug. 10 in The Lancet, includes alarming findings devastating to the COVID vaccine rollout.
The study found vaccinated individuals carry 251 times the load of COVID-19 viruses in their nostrils compared to the unvaccinated.
While moderating the symptoms of infection, the jab allows vaccinated individuals to carry unusually high viral loads without becoming ill at first, potentially transforming them into presymptomatic superspreaders.
This phenomenon may be the source of the shocking post-vaccination surges in heavily vaccinated populations globally.
The paper’s authors, Chau et al, demonstrated widespread vaccine failure and transmission under tightly controlled circumstances in a hospital lockdown in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
The scientists studied healthcare workers who were unable to leave the hospital for two weeks. The data showed that fully vaccinated workers — about two months after injection with the Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (AZD1222) — acquired, carried and presumably transmitted the Delta variant to their vaccinated colleagues.
Yeah ... not sure about your point. You are apparently day drinking. It's cool, I've done that myself. This is a STUDY. I know that because that's what they fucking said. Not sure what you don't get about it being a study. A study, and a clinical trial are not the same thing. It's empirical evidence gathered to present important findings based on an event where you have enough observations (population) to draw some extremely important inferences.
Why are you hung up on the word "study?" Means nothing by itself.
It is an observation of what happened after the fact.
If you are cruising along the freeway and you see a car accident, and you get out to look to figure out what happened after the fact, are you doing a "study?"
Just because they say it is a "study" doesn't mean much. Look at what they are actually doing.
AFTER a 2-week lockdown, they noticed something unusual: (a) people who were vaxxed got the coof, (b) from others who were all living in a controlled environment (no contact with outsiders) but were not symptomatic, and (c) their viral loads were way higher than the data from a year ago when nobody was vaxxed.
They then concluded that it is POSSIBLE that a post-vaxx person MIGHT be an "asymptomatic superspreader." Seems like a reasonable possibility.
This is not a scientfic study in the "double blind clinical trial" sense, though, and was never intended to be. That is my point. It was not set up as a scientific study. It was a post-event observation, with data compared to pre-vaxx data. Some people are bashing it because there was not a "control group." I say, so what? It was not set up to be a scientific study in the first place. It is post-event observation, like the car crash.
It is more like an epidemiological study, which can never show cause and effect, but can be a STARTING POINT for further study. The nature of such a thing cannot prove anything, but it is good evidence for an hypothesis, and then further study of that hypothesis.
You do realize that you and I ... we are in agreement. We agree. I, AGREE WITH YOU.
I think you need to expand on what it is that I posted that compelled you to respond to my post with anything other than ... yep.
Are you responding to someone elses comment via my comment?