Logically:Scenario 1 is not 'ideal' - it is the worst option.
With this (faux) vax, Scenario 1 (all vaxxed) is Scenario 3 (mutations) on steroids.
Why? Because this vax does not stop people from getting sick or transmitting it to others.
Therefore, the 'all vaxxed' option would still allow mutations, would prevent patient deaths that would 'cull' those dangerous mutations, and the option is maxxed out to the entire population.
Even with his pro-vax bias, your friend should see that. A non-vax, which is posing as a real-vax, is a bad thing.
No, I didn't 'jump on you', or 'attack you' --- I was trying to help by walking through a logical argument that you could use with your friend.
If 'everyone' is vaxxed, then 'everyone survives' (and every mutation survives).
If 'half' are vaxxed, then at least 'some' of the bad mutations would die off.
Therefore, the 'all-vaxxed' option keeps more mutations alive -- therefore (logically) it is the least-preferable option.
(Of course, this 'logical' argument is limited to the 'mutation' issue. Personally, I think that 'exercise of free-will' is a far better argument against vax mandates, but I realize that some people don't think free-will is important anymore.)
If you disagree with me, that's fine. I'll withdraw my small effort to help.
Logically: Scenario 1 is not 'ideal' - it is the worst option.
With this (faux) vax, Scenario 1 (all vaxxed) is Scenario 3 (mutations) on steroids.
Why? Because this vax does not stop people from getting sick or transmitting it to others.
Therefore, the 'all vaxxed' option would still allow mutations, would prevent patient deaths that would 'cull' those dangerous mutations, and the option is maxxed out to the entire population.
Even with his pro-vax bias, your friend should see that. A non-vax, which is posing as a real-vax, is a bad thing.
No, I didn't 'jump on you', or 'attack you' --- I was trying to help by walking through a logical argument that you could use with your friend.
If 'everyone' is vaxxed, then 'everyone survives' (and every mutation survives).
If 'half' are vaxxed, then at least 'some' of the bad mutations would die off.
Therefore, the 'all-vaxxed' option keeps more mutations alive -- therefore (logically) it is the least-preferable option.
(Of course, this 'logical' argument is limited to the 'mutation' issue. Personally, I think that 'exercise of free-will' is a far better argument against vax mandates, but I realize that some people don't think free-will is important anymore.)
If you disagree with me, that's fine. I'll withdraw my small effort to help.