No, I didn't 'jump on you', or 'attack you' --- I was trying to help by walking through a logical argument that you could use with your friend.
If 'everyone' is vaxxed, then 'everyone survives' (and every mutation survives).
If 'half' are vaxxed, then at least 'some' of the bad mutations would die off.
Therefore, the 'all-vaxxed' option keeps more mutations alive -- therefore (logically) it is the least-preferable option.
(Of course, this 'logical' argument is limited to the 'mutation' issue. Personally, I think that 'exercise of free-will' is a far better argument against vax mandates, but I realize that some people don't think free-will is important anymore.)
If you disagree with me, that's fine. I'll withdraw my small effort to help.
No, I didn't 'jump on you', or 'attack you' --- I was trying to help by walking through a logical argument that you could use with your friend.
If 'everyone' is vaxxed, then 'everyone survives' (and every mutation survives).
If 'half' are vaxxed, then at least 'some' of the bad mutations would die off.
Therefore, the 'all-vaxxed' option keeps more mutations alive -- therefore (logically) it is the least-preferable option.
(Of course, this 'logical' argument is limited to the 'mutation' issue. Personally, I think that 'exercise of free-will' is a far better argument against vax mandates, but I realize that some people don't think free-will is important anymore.)
If you disagree with me, that's fine. I'll withdraw my small effort to help.