I propose that one should have to be a parent with a child in the district to sit on the Board of Education / Too many cat ladies that put off controlling pedophile vibes mixed with Gay Men, with no kids. TAKE BACK YOUR TOWNS - The Great Awakening

405

I propose that one should have to be a parent with a child in the district to sit on the Board of Education / Too many cat ladies that put off controlling pedophile vibes mixed with Gay Men, with no kids. TAKE BACK YOUR TOWNS

posted 3 years ago by Oh_Well_ian 3 years ago by Oh_Well_ian +406 / -1

44 comments

44 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (44)

sorted by:

▲ 11 ▼

– Oh_Well_ian [S] 11 points 3 years ago +12 / -1

That's what attending the meetings is about.

You wanna serve on the board? You better have kids that go there.

This would also limit terms for Board members.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– Cheesecakecrush 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

What about people whose kids grew up and no longer attend, but the people on the board have been contributing to the community in that way for years? I think you might need to relax just a tad on this. For instance: "My niece attends school in this district." That is technically "skin in the game," wouldn't you agree?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– ChunkStyle1 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Also, school boards propose budgets and property owners without children in the school pay the outrageous property taxes (which fund School budgets in my state). They deserve a voice also.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– EarOfCornpop 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Exactly. As a taxpayer with grown kids, I deserve input regarding taxes. The largest portion of my property taxes go for schools.

Parents with enrolled kids should have the biggest voice regarding curriculum and operational policies.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q