Most of you patriots on GA may already know this, but it is new to me. I was trying to help someone who needs a religious exemption for the collage they are attending and this is what I found. Iβm passing it on for the newbies.
List of ingredients in Covid vax: https://portal.ct.gov/Coronavirus/Covid-19-Knowledge-Base/Vaccine-Ingredients
Noticed Modernaβs SM-102. I did a quick search and found this: https://www.caymanchem.com/product/33474
Notice the warning the company making Luciferase says: https://www.caymanchem.com/product/33474
It is not for human or veterinarian use.
Q said KNOWINGLY 54 times. If π companies knowingly put toxins, poison in a product only meant for lab use, then they have no protection from law suits.
Ok, couple things.
First, Cayman's use of SM-102 "for research only" is not indicative of the larger group of all users of SM-102 for research only. For example, you can buy all sorts of chemicals online that you can get a prescription for, but are labeled "for research only" from the online manufacturers and sellers, because that is the only qualification they can get to sell it to the public.
Second, the "warning" is for SM-102 in 90% chloroform solution. Such lipids are stored and shipped in chloroform because it remains liquid at appropriate temperatures and prevents clumping of the lipids.
The amino lipid itself (SM-102) looks like a normal lipid to me. I see no obvious problems with it entering metabolic pathways and being broken down. Now that doesn't mean that such problems don't exist. Maybe they do, but no one has provided a single piece of evidence to support that. Somewhere around here (in one of my 5,000,000 posts) I found a paper that showed that a study suggested that it was broken down just fine by the body. I can't find it atm, so take that with a grain of salt.
The company doesn't "make" Luciferase. I have "made" Luciferase by making cells make it. It is a very commonly used reporting tools in these types of experiments. The naming of it may be suspicious, but as for its place in experiments, it would only be suspicious if it was NOT used.
Unless you can find metabolism data that suggests that SM-102 is harmful, I really think this line of investigation is barking up the wrong tree. There are so many problems with the vaccines; I have not seen any credible evidence that SM-102 is one of them.