We are not crazy. You're just blind. If you don't believe, then please explain it to us.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
Just get your spiral triangle tattoo removed. It’s a pedophile symbol, clearly. These are not coincidences, just like Podesta wasn’t ACTUALLY talking about pizza and Obama didn’t ACTUALLY spend $60,000 on hot dogs for one party.
Oh, I try to avoid having identifying marks. I take being an anon somewhat seriously.
Haha ok, I am just kidding. Look, I agree that not EVERY spiral ever is a pedophile symbol, but when it’s both a spiral AND a triangle AND it’s connected to kid’s stuff AND the mark doesn’t really make much sense, like on that Jungle Book CD, then I don’t think it’s empty pattern recognition to be pointing this out.
And I mean, if these types of random patterns are so innocent, then we should be able to choose another symbol - say, a diamond split into four sections, or a four-leaf clover with a crooked stem - and then find an equal amount of examples of that symbol on kid’s products, and yet, no debunker has done this.
Why would a debunker do this?
Why don't YOU do that?
Being a good researcher means TRYING to falsify your own argument. It means actively looking for evidence that you're wrong. It means laying out very clearly exactly how someone can defeat your argument.
If you want to defeat the theory of evolution, there are a LOT of very clear types of proof you could do that with.
For instance, you could find an example of a trait in an organism that exclusively harms its own reproductive success but helps another species.
That would be really bizarre in evolutionary terms. But nobody has yet found an example of this in nature.
And they're always looking, because the scientist that can beat evolutionary theory will literally be as famous as Einstein was for beating Newton's theories on physics.
You don't need to wait for some debunker to get around to doing this. You can do it. You go out, find a random symbol, and start digging into it with the same fervor that you dug into this one.
See what comes up.
Then do it again, for a few others.
Look for deltas between Q and Cardi B, or Trump and Neil deGrasse Tyson, and see if there's anything interesting there.
You're allowed to try to falsify your own argument. It'll not only prove that you have a non-faith-based argument (that it's falsifiable and therefore scientifically valid), but you'll also get to the truth of the matter much faster than waiting around for people to do your research for you.
You should know EXACTLY how to defeat your own beliefs in literally everything. And you should be advertising how to do it. And you should actively be trying to do it. Because that's the only way you can arrive at the strongest possible argument (and belief).
Dr. David Berlinski mathematically and scientifically debunked evolution and he’s not as famous as Darwin because the narrative isn’t interested in truth. I think it’s naive to believe that Big Science would immediately embrace someone who questions their conclusions.
https://youtu.be/Z6ElA0--JNg
I have taken a skeptical approach to Q and Pizzagate, but the photo evidence and leaked emails I’ve seen do not have a reasonable or skeptical explanation that I find believable.