A new bill has just been passed in Australia called Identify and Disrupt Bill
Essentially, this bill allows is, the Australian Federal Police (AFP) can log into your Email, your Facebook, Instagram any other social media, and not only view it but actually alter it however they want. They can send emails on your behalf, they can post things on your behalf, they can engage in criminal activity on your behalf in order to reach their objective. And if they want to throw you under the bus, you’re just collateral damage.
There is a petition to repeal this bill
Please pass the word to any Aussies you know to sign this petition and get the word out.
Yes, they are obliged to answer, and cannot lie. Tape every interaction, better yet, film it. Look into the law for support in your jurisdiction.
It works under common law as well as civil law jurisdictions. The sanctions on civil servants may vary. However, more serious charges can be brought: membership of a criminal organization should it turn out more people are involved. Or even: terrorism, as they seek to scare the public to obtain a political goal.
On 28-10-2020 one of our Dutch hero's employed this tactic and the case has been such a mess for the judiciary, they dare not even publish the outcome. Usually within 2 weeks rulings are published. As of yesterday, no ruling in this case has been published.
A couple of weeks ago, another such case and was thrown out of court. My friends stood outside within 5 minutes.
Many more are using and going to use this system.
It puts these blackmailers in total disarray. They cannot lie, for if they do, they are deeply fucked sideways. And silence also is not an option because as public servants they are obliged to impart all information truthfully to make sure the claimant has the correct information to not lose his claim.
Many of them simply singed their employment papers, took an oath and received their ID, their uniform and hop they are on the streets on team harassment. Neither of these is authorization to impede rights.
Of course, they will try to refuse the contract you are offering because they know they cannot enter into such contracts as public servants to which they have no authorization, but they can as private citizens under common or civil law.
However, their performance in initiating any of the events described in the contract suffices to support the free volition of entering. This also goes for those commanding these poor wretches to harass people, the mayor, the governor, anyone in the chain of command. What they have are internal memorandums.
So, they knowingly and of free volition agreed to the terms of contract.
Not paying while making you perform the suffering of these events is breach of contract which ups the ante due to collection costs and equity damages.
However, this is a fight. So play it cool and understand what you are doing. And these robbers may simply choose to violate the law later by trying to maintain you failed to pay a fine. It's bogus, yet you have to respond.
In a way this is better than a shooting war. But know you are then in the thick of destroying the banking system.
The DS has many options to frustrate:
One officer may be leaving the issue and you alone, while another may be cooking the books afterwards. Then a fine falls on your doormat, or even a visit of the 4 AM morning raid team with violence because you failed to ID yourself.
Fine -> resist -> reject further action
Fine -> resist -> unfavorable admin ruling -> Prosecutor -> reject
Fine -> resit -> unfavorable admin ruling -> Prosecutor -> court -> reject.
The same goes for court: question the "judge", who are you, and what is your business here? It happens quite often, a judge is not even a judge but a civil servant posing as a judge lacking authorization.
If they have authorization, who authorized the judge? Where is the authorization? (betting they have none) Who authorized the authorizer to authorize? What kind of a court is this? Is it a corporation (maybe registered in Delaware?). What system of law is being decided here?
If they say: common law -> Does common law have mandatory performances without contract? What needs to be done before a contract is valid?
However, if you are willing to go full throttle, this may be tried first.
There is another thing: look into the law and see if there is a provision about medical doctors declaring something pertaining to the presence or absence of any disease, or something. A false statement is punishable by? So, if they are still using the disgraced PCR based on the Corman-Drosten paper, this is refuted based on 10 fatal flaws. More info here: https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/ and https://principia-scientific.com/christian-drosten-the-fraud-behind-covid-19-pcr-testing/
The proof that this is all fake is quite clear. However, forced quarantines and stuff are usually accompanied by a declaration of a doctor. If not a doctor, there should not be made a health determination. If not medical it is political, and hence fit to be drawn into common law or civil law.