Q started the same day that Durham became interim acting US attorney (October 28th, 2017).
First, you had the Huber investigation. Huber was a team of 740 (which is a huge team) then Huber turned over most of his work to "Durham" in 2019. If you read the timeline in the article you'll see how the Durham investigation evolved.
Most people do not understand how investigations work. They're completely caught up in the myth that "reports" mean anything. They mean sh**. They're just for the public.
The investigation turns over to the IG and to the executive who then takes those findings and can do things like impanel a Grand Jury (and that is what has been happening but was paused during the Scandemic). Barr shifted Durham to a Special Counsel so the investigation could continue under Biden.
Most of what the investigation finds is not revealed to the public especially when you are still presenting it to a grand jury. You can't reveal something that is still being prosecuted. Many of the witnesses would be in extreme danger if their identities were revealed.
But people just obsessed over the report stuff because they can't be bothered to do a little research.
First, you had the Huber investigation. Huber was a team of 740 (which is a huge team) then Huber turned over most of his work to "Durham" in 2019.
Don't sugar-coat what happened to the Huber investigation. Try it with salt instead.
Billy Barr stopped the (huge) Huber probe, while alleging [in effect] that it was because Huber was not producing enough results. He then installed his republican party establishment swamp lackey- John Durham to be in charge of all the evidence that the (huge) Huber team had gathered. Three years later, we still got nothing, zero, zilch to show for it.
The purpose of John Durham is to extend the so called "investigation" into infinity, and run the clock out on justice. This is the same playbook the swamp always uses. It's just like Benghazi, Uranium One, Seth Rich, Lois Learner IRS targeting, Fast&Furious, HRC illegal basement server loaded with natl. security documents, Las Vegas massacre, etc. etc.
Based on swamp history, and pattern recognition, It is more likely that John Durham is just another DS swamp rat.
Everything you said is solely based on what you want to believe and not on what the actual evidence shows. Q even said that Huber had a team of 740. So... you don't believe in Q's words at all.
In your opinion the Trust Huber and Durham are all lies. You basically think all of Q is a lie then. Q is just part of the swamp and lied about all of that then.
If what you believe is true "The purpose of John Durham is to run out the clock" (and let the Deep State get away with things) then you think Q is a psyop and a larp. If you believe what you just said then you think Q is a lie. There's not sugarcoating that.
Not sure what you're really on this forum for since everything is already over in your eyes. In your view the swamp has won and it's time to pack it up.
All the facts I see of the timeline and everything show you are wrong, but hey, believe what you want to believe. It's still not true and not based on the truth and the reality of the situation.
In your opinion the Trust Huber and Durham are all lies. You basically think all of Q is a lie then. Q is just part of the swamp and lied about all of that then.
Your opinions about what my opinions mean are completely wrong.
Q has never demanded that we believe everything Q has said. But Q did tell us to think for ourselves; and that disinformation is necessary.
Just because Q states something, it does not make that statement factual. And even though Q may believe something to be correct, Q is [likely] human, and therefore subject to errors as well. I just happen to believe (because I think for myself) that Q's references to Billy Barr, Wray, and Durham all fit somewheres between "disinformation," and error.
"No plan survives contact with the enemy."
"Never underestimate your enemies."
No good plan is made without contingency plans. I believe Q team is still fighting for justice. But I do not underestimate the damage that traitors can cause, and the possibility that Q may currently be on the defensive due to traitors- traitors like Billy Barr, Chris Wray, and John Durham.
However, you want to say it you think the plan failed. Q was not in control. Trump and Q were just flaw-proned humans who let in a bunch of traitors and had no idea what they're doing and misled everyone into think the patriots were winning. In essence all those claims were lies. Your opinion is clear that you think it's all over. We're doomed. Q and Trump didn't know what the hell they were doing. The enemy was just way stronger than they understood. Game over.
You kept saying that's not you're opinion, but that is exactly what your opinion is.
(Your words, "And even though Q may believe something to be true...".)
What do you base your "BB and Durham" were disinformation on? What the MSM said? Those reports? Basically you base it on the fake news and your own personal feelings.
Your words are a roundabout way of saying you think Q is wrong and the Q posts were wrong and you think the plan failed.
Q made the case about Huber and Durham over and over. That was not misinfo and misdirection. If you read Q enough you can figure out what was for clowns and what wasn't.
The Huber and Durham stuff has been emphasized non-stop by Q. Trump still teases about it. I have dug very deep into and I know that actually the white hats are stomping it, but you have to dig. Also saying "because.... reports" is silly. That is now at all how investigations work. Reports are just public theater. They don't do jack.
But some people just don't get how little reports mean for an ongoing investigation. Of course, you can't share the actual details when it's a live investigation.
We can agree to disagree. As it stand from the evidence and digging I've done the white hats are stomping on the DS. I love digging and I will continue to do so. My opinions will come from my own research.
But believe what you want. I think you're 100% wrong on Durham and the evidence supports my side.
No.
Q started the same day that Durham became interim acting US attorney (October 28th, 2017).
First, you had the Huber investigation. Huber was a team of 740 (which is a huge team) then Huber turned over most of his work to "Durham" in 2019. If you read the timeline in the article you'll see how the Durham investigation evolved.
Most people do not understand how investigations work. They're completely caught up in the myth that "reports" mean anything. They mean sh**. They're just for the public.
The investigation turns over to the IG and to the executive who then takes those findings and can do things like impanel a Grand Jury (and that is what has been happening but was paused during the Scandemic). Barr shifted Durham to a Special Counsel so the investigation could continue under Biden.
Most of what the investigation finds is not revealed to the public especially when you are still presenting it to a grand jury. You can't reveal something that is still being prosecuted. Many of the witnesses would be in extreme danger if their identities were revealed.
But people just obsessed over the report stuff because they can't be bothered to do a little research.
Thank You for a considered response. I was sharing my opinion, we all have them.
Don't sugar-coat what happened to the Huber investigation. Try it with salt instead.
Billy Barr stopped the (huge) Huber probe, while alleging [in effect] that it was because Huber was not producing enough results. He then installed his republican party establishment swamp lackey- John Durham to be in charge of all the evidence that the (huge) Huber team had gathered. Three years later, we still got nothing, zero, zilch to show for it.
The purpose of John Durham is to extend the so called "investigation" into infinity, and run the clock out on justice. This is the same playbook the swamp always uses. It's just like Benghazi, Uranium One, Seth Rich, Lois Learner IRS targeting, Fast&Furious, HRC illegal basement server loaded with natl. security documents, Las Vegas massacre, etc. etc.
Based on swamp history, and pattern recognition, It is more likely that John Durham is just another DS swamp rat.
Bollocks.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/05/breaking-attorney-general-barr-discloses-us-attorney-huber-never-even-started-his-investigation-us-attorney-john-durham-took-over-his-work/
How much do you trust Billy Barr, and the invisible super hero John "MIA" Durham?
You literally don't know anything about John Durham lmao
Everything you said is solely based on what you want to believe and not on what the actual evidence shows. Q even said that Huber had a team of 740. So... you don't believe in Q's words at all.
In your opinion the Trust Huber and Durham are all lies. You basically think all of Q is a lie then. Q is just part of the swamp and lied about all of that then.
If what you believe is true "The purpose of John Durham is to run out the clock" (and let the Deep State get away with things) then you think Q is a psyop and a larp. If you believe what you just said then you think Q is a lie. There's not sugarcoating that.
Not sure what you're really on this forum for since everything is already over in your eyes. In your view the swamp has won and it's time to pack it up.
All the facts I see of the timeline and everything show you are wrong, but hey, believe what you want to believe. It's still not true and not based on the truth and the reality of the situation.
Your opinions about what my opinions mean are completely wrong.
Q has never demanded that we believe everything Q has said. But Q did tell us to think for ourselves; and that disinformation is necessary.
Just because Q states something, it does not make that statement factual. And even though Q may believe something to be correct, Q is [likely] human, and therefore subject to errors as well. I just happen to believe (because I think for myself) that Q's references to Billy Barr, Wray, and Durham all fit somewheres between "disinformation," and error.
"No plan survives contact with the enemy."
"Never underestimate your enemies."
No good plan is made without contingency plans. I believe Q team is still fighting for justice. But I do not underestimate the damage that traitors can cause, and the possibility that Q may currently be on the defensive due to traitors- traitors like Billy Barr, Chris Wray, and John Durham.
However, you want to say it you think the plan failed. Q was not in control. Trump and Q were just flaw-proned humans who let in a bunch of traitors and had no idea what they're doing and misled everyone into think the patriots were winning. In essence all those claims were lies. Your opinion is clear that you think it's all over. We're doomed. Q and Trump didn't know what the hell they were doing. The enemy was just way stronger than they understood. Game over.
You kept saying that's not you're opinion, but that is exactly what your opinion is.
(Your words, "And even though Q may believe something to be true...".)
What do you base your "BB and Durham" were disinformation on? What the MSM said? Those reports? Basically you base it on the fake news and your own personal feelings.
Your words are a roundabout way of saying you think Q is wrong and the Q posts were wrong and you think the plan failed.
Q made the case about Huber and Durham over and over. That was not misinfo and misdirection. If you read Q enough you can figure out what was for clowns and what wasn't.
The Huber and Durham stuff has been emphasized non-stop by Q. Trump still teases about it. I have dug very deep into and I know that actually the white hats are stomping it, but you have to dig. Also saying "because.... reports" is silly. That is now at all how investigations work. Reports are just public theater. They don't do jack.
But some people just don't get how little reports mean for an ongoing investigation. Of course, you can't share the actual details when it's a live investigation.
We can agree to disagree. As it stand from the evidence and digging I've done the white hats are stomping on the DS. I love digging and I will continue to do so. My opinions will come from my own research.
But believe what you want. I think you're 100% wrong on Durham and the evidence supports my side.