The FDA approval lists Comirnaty as the officially approved shot. Although it claims this shot is interchangeable with the EUA Pfizer shot, it explicitly says that the two shots are "legally distinct". Document EVERYTHING and do not sign any waivers. This will be a lawsuit goldmine for service members who decide to get the shot if they are not given Comirnaty.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
Silly rabbit still thinks the normal rules apply. Informed consent has been completely flushed down the shitter and the EUA (aka no-can-sue) jab is the largest clinical trial in history, courtesy of the globocommie technocrat transhumanists. Why would they feel compelled to inform you if you're in the control group?
How do you expect to get paid in a lawsuit that, if you prevailed, would promptly inspire about 3 billion others to do the same? I don't think there's enough money on earth to cover that claim. Then again, if your goal is to destroy the global economy then usher in a new globocrypto controlled by the World Bank that can be easily deactivated any time a sheeple posts a mean tweet, then maybe your landmark lawsuit and the few billion others that follow will succeed in speeding us to that fate. Or maybe the massive class action will net you a sweet settlement check for $5.62 like all those Thalidomide babies who are living easy now.
Start thinking bigger and realize that unless you got an invite to Barry's raver a couple weeks ago, you're not on the "marked safe from chattel" list just like all us crazy Q tards. You may not think you're one of us now, but as Master Yoda said, "You will be".
So you're suggesting that the White Hats switched out the stuff that was in my vaccine, secretly, without informed consent, and then are banking on it simply being too infeasible for them to have to answer legally to what they did for there to be any consequences for doing that?
You guys are fully cognizant that injecting someone with a different substance than they thought is a pretty serious crime. You'd also be correct. The criminal nature and consequences of that action don't change just because of the color of hat the injector is wearing.
I'm suggesting that some crimes, if large enough, will go unpunished if the risk of prosecuting them is total economic collapse. Surely you are old enough to remember AIG? Imagine that but with half the planet as claimants.
Isn't this literally the basis of why the Deep State is a problem? That fighting them effectively apparently requires the deaths of tens of millions of people by the vaccine and whatnot?
Isn't that literally the reason why people here have a problem with the Cabal? That they've engrained themselves so deeply into society that dislodging them apparently requires tearing up the foundations of said society?
I don't think, "I'm too big to prosecute for crimes against humanity" could easily be considered a justification for committing a crime against humanity. Unless you're on the side of the Deep State, I suppose.
Do you want Pfizer's official list?
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/covid-19-vaccines-us.html#Appendix-C
Because most people here don't trust sources that are official. But maybe you do.
I'm not entirely sure exactly what you're wanting to compare, though. Saline is salt water.
I agreed to get a vaccine. If I was given salt water instead, then they injected me with a chemical I never agreed to. Which I can then sue them for.
I can also sue if it's a poison. I can sue if it's literally anything other than what it says on the box. Regardless of what I actually got. Regardless of how safe or unsafe it is.
Regardless of whether it was a White Hat or Black Hat operation.
I am uncertain how the ingredients list will help you reconcile that.