The FDA approval lists Comirnaty as the officially approved shot. Although it claims this shot is interchangeable with the EUA Pfizer shot, it explicitly says that the two shots are "legally distinct". Document EVERYTHING and do not sign any waivers. This will be a lawsuit goldmine for service members who decide to get the shot if they are not given Comirnaty.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
So you're suggesting that the White Hats switched out the stuff that was in my vaccine, secretly, without informed consent, and then are banking on it simply being too infeasible for them to have to answer legally to what they did for there to be any consequences for doing that?
You guys are fully cognizant that injecting someone with a different substance than they thought is a pretty serious crime. You'd also be correct. The criminal nature and consequences of that action don't change just because of the color of hat the injector is wearing.
I'm suggesting that some crimes, if large enough, will go unpunished if the risk of prosecuting them is total economic collapse. Surely you are old enough to remember AIG? Imagine that but with half the planet as claimants.
Isn't this literally the basis of why the Deep State is a problem? That fighting them effectively apparently requires the deaths of tens of millions of people by the vaccine and whatnot?
Isn't that literally the reason why people here have a problem with the Cabal? That they've engrained themselves so deeply into society that dislodging them apparently requires tearing up the foundations of said society?
I don't think, "I'm too big to prosecute for crimes against humanity" could easily be considered a justification for committing a crime against humanity. Unless you're on the side of the Deep State, I suppose.
Do you want Pfizer's official list?
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/covid-19-vaccines-us.html#Appendix-C
Because most people here don't trust sources that are official. But maybe you do.
I'm not entirely sure exactly what you're wanting to compare, though. Saline is salt water.
I agreed to get a vaccine. If I was given salt water instead, then they injected me with a chemical I never agreed to. Which I can then sue them for.
I can also sue if it's a poison. I can sue if it's literally anything other than what it says on the box. Regardless of what I actually got. Regardless of how safe or unsafe it is.
Regardless of whether it was a White Hat or Black Hat operation.
I am uncertain how the ingredients list will help you reconcile that.
You should really read the study they're talking about yourself.
Here, I did the research for you.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/graphene-oxide-detection-aqueous-suspension/5749529
It's a single lab that investigated a single vial that was labeled as the Pfizer vaccine.
It came from a courier, and they don't know from where. It says so at the top of the study. They cannot trace the origin or even confirm that was was in the vial was actually the COVID-19 vaccine.
Which is why they call it an aqueous suspension, rather than confirm it was a vaccine. They can't, because they don't know where the fuck this vial came from. Aqueous suspension means, "something suspended in water."
You tell me if you think that makes a strong argument that the vaccines contain graphene oxide once you've done the research.