Of course, but doing so too early could create quite a few difficulties as it would publicly push a lot of DS into a corner and even with what little is coming out now they are already starting to do the cornered animal thing(the march on DC 9/11 FF CIA operation is just one example)....
No, I was implying Trump is fine with CIA controlled msm not reporting these wins because they will eventually come to light. It's a public issue on the back burner that frees him up to concentrate on other issues publicly.
Not large enough foot print to mater but still large enough to be a part of the awakening and people aware of it, I mean the same could have be said about Q at one point early on.
The sense I get in regard to the judges is that it is basically a 'why not use a twitter(now gab) account of some field personnel to get some additional info out that will still be small enough to be deniable/non-threatening in size and public awareness' kind of thing, drip-drip-drip was made into a point by Q for a reason...
this doesn't counter it. When Trump lost cases we had links to the court documents floating around.
Right now we have anonymous accounts telling us there were court victories but they can't give us links because it would give away the game to 'the enemy'.
Of course, but doing so too early could create quite a few difficulties as it would publicly push a lot of DS into a corner and even with what little is coming out now they are already starting to do the cornered animal thing(the march on DC 9/11 FF CIA operation is just one example)....
Some people underestimate the advantages of being stealth.
It's always the fucker you don't see coming................
The greatest weapon know to man?
Surprise!
Aaaahhhhh, classic UHF ...
Or was it VHF?
Silly! :-)
This comment deserves an updoot.
So your premise is, because these cases aren't being reported on by MSM, that DS is unaware of them. Interesting hypothesis. Seems unlikely.
No, I was implying Trump is fine with CIA controlled msm not reporting these wins because they will eventually come to light. It's a public issue on the back burner that frees him up to concentrate on other issues publicly.
And when these wins do gain traction and spread they have a greater, more memorable impact because msm suppressed them.
That being the case, why bring it up??
Not large enough foot print to mater but still large enough to be a part of the awakening and people aware of it, I mean the same could have be said about Q at one point early on.
The sense I get in regard to the judges is that it is basically a 'why not use a twitter(now gab) account of some field personnel to get some additional info out that will still be small enough to be deniable/non-threatening in size and public awareness' kind of thing, drip-drip-drip was made into a point by Q for a reason...
To counter the Reeeee ..... muh Trump lost cases
this doesn't counter it. When Trump lost cases we had links to the court documents floating around.
Right now we have anonymous accounts telling us there were court victories but they can't give us links because it would give away the game to 'the enemy'.