A question. Why are the 5 eye nations locked down so severely, CAN, UK, NZ and AUS? The US is pushing back towards. The difference is we are armed. But why so hard the other 4 relative to other nations?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
Its not the "difference is that we are armed" at all. You seem to miss the obvious reality that the UK, CAN, AUS and NZ follow a completely different political arraignment than the US and they are smaller.
The structure of the political systems there allow for more cohesion. They're also smaller population wise, so it's easier to control subsections of society when you've got that on your side.
Don't fool yourself into thinking you'd actually do something with those weapons or that the police or military are afraid of you with those weapons. I see Americans all the time on here assuming or gloating it's because "we're armed".
No. It's really not. Biden wasn't misspeaking when he said about the tanks.
Besides, remember that they unseated a duly elected president and installed their own puppet, all without the American public lifting a gun in defense.... in fact, if you suggest it on this board you'll be met with "yOuRe A sHIlL!".
If the shoe fits, wear it shill.
You do not have a strong grasp on reality. The armed civilian population outnumber the US military 150:1
Besides, do you think the military would raise their weapons against their own family and neighbors? They follow commands, not all commands. The military would go rouge and turn on this government if they ever asked them to take aim on the American people.
All without firing a shot? What/who were we going to shoot? Voting machines? Newscasters?
If we were to start a second revolutionary war here, the UN would get involved, things could get messy. We have the truth and evidence on our side. Why not use it and prosecute the guilty parties and keep the gun play in Hollywood.