I know it makes sense to have commodities that have value, other than dollar bills and coins. My question is, if gold and silver were a threat to the elite, something that would give us freedom from their debt creating industry, wouldn't they have control of it all? The gold and silver, I mean.
The commodity itself is no threat. What they did was change the rules of the game in such a way that slowly over time assets were flowing into their direction away from us. Facts are replaced by fiction. And those with a lot of fictitious currency, think they are rich. They are not, not unless they exchange their fiction for fact. And those with facts happily part with it.
This is what Texas representative Patman meant when observing in 1933 about banks: the American people will wake up one day home less on the continent their fathers conquered.
What happens when we use PM and other assets to do business? It puts a little cog in the wheel of their operation. Think of it: every asset that matters is tracked and taxed. Trinkets are not. That is why there is a divergence in asset pricing. Gold is shooting up, but capped. Silver is shooting down, but capped in a bandwidth of a ratio of 80 - 110. And it is going up and down. Pump and dump.
The best option they have to impede an awakening populace is to push an economic destruction. Great Reset. Think of the Maslow Pyramid and think of the majority of people. yes .....FF-ed if push comes to shove. With the majority enthralled in the fiction, why worry?
So, once the DS has tucked all these nice assets under it's belt, you really think they are going to be worried about gold or silver in the hands of a couple of patriots?
Enter the great reset and build back better, analogous to being in a land without clean drinking water. The little assets you have, you will gladly part with it for just a cup. So, it matters not whether you have these assets or not. The system virtually guarantees their handover.
A different matter is, when you combine it with land, your own water resources, your own electricity production, your own food supply. You are then in control of your own supply chain. You could even help others sustain themselves by barter.
Only a total environmental destruction, by radiation, by long periods of bad weather, pollution, or a war of sorts (be it a shooting war or a persecution of all those who fend for themselves under the guise of national security; see Atlas Shrugged)
Those of us working on creating and expanding a parallel economy have several options to pursue. Think of it in terms of what WOOFF is doing. Farmers offer food and shelter and leisure time against 4-6 hours of work a day on an organic farm. I can tell you from experience, this is quite an interesting way of living. In one instance their was a group between 20 -30 people all traveling across the globe, meeting new people, sitting around a campfire, passing the dutchy and telling stories. Once a week on the market the grown food was sold and a portion of it was put to extras and luxurious goods.
The best asset you have is you. So, it makes sense to add to your assets, to develop choice.
Some have chosen to use 50 USD to build an alternative stream of income, and put this income into the development of assets. In France I have seen younger people buying large plots of land by paying the now 80-90 old geezers a monthly sum of 300 euro's as long as these old people would live.
I met a guy who was an expert on water tables and water flow in soil. During his stay he investigated that flow under the plot we were at. This way water could be better secured. But he exchanged his knowledge and power for food and shelter. That is barter in it's essence.
Yes, if you put it in a larger context of preparedness and independence.
So, we all should have a progress plan, where risks are identified and mitigated.
For instance, right now you have a job. And hence, an income. How much can you use to move to acquire assets?
One way to do so, would be to buy some crypto, move it into Peth Mint silver or gold coin, and move to receive delivery, when a certain quantity is reached.
Where to stash it? What happens if? How do I evade obviousness? What happens if I have to move quickly? To where?
In basic terms this is called wargaming. But it presupposes knowledge of the local operating procedures and mitigation strategies.
If worked out, train them and review on a regular basis if your plans still meet the quality of reality and functionality. With awareness raised, improvisation does not becomes a lucky draw.
I know it makes sense to have commodities that have value, other than dollar bills and coins. My question is, if gold and silver were a threat to the elite, something that would give us freedom from their debt creating industry, wouldn't they have control of it all? The gold and silver, I mean.
The commodity itself is no threat. What they did was change the rules of the game in such a way that slowly over time assets were flowing into their direction away from us. Facts are replaced by fiction. And those with a lot of fictitious currency, think they are rich. They are not, not unless they exchange their fiction for fact. And those with facts happily part with it.
This is what Texas representative Patman meant when observing in 1933 about banks: the American people will wake up one day home less on the continent their fathers conquered.
What happens when we use PM and other assets to do business? It puts a little cog in the wheel of their operation. Think of it: every asset that matters is tracked and taxed. Trinkets are not. That is why there is a divergence in asset pricing. Gold is shooting up, but capped. Silver is shooting down, but capped in a bandwidth of a ratio of 80 - 110. And it is going up and down. Pump and dump.
The best option they have to impede an awakening populace is to push an economic destruction. Great Reset. Think of the Maslow Pyramid and think of the majority of people. yes .....FF-ed if push comes to shove. With the majority enthralled in the fiction, why worry?
See also Pickety, arguing no real assets are needed, but debt is more than enough. The whole WEF crowd was riding high on this idea. https://mises.org/library/thomas-piketty-inequality-and-capital
So, once the DS has tucked all these nice assets under it's belt, you really think they are going to be worried about gold or silver in the hands of a couple of patriots?
Enter the great reset and build back better, analogous to being in a land without clean drinking water. The little assets you have, you will gladly part with it for just a cup. So, it matters not whether you have these assets or not. The system virtually guarantees their handover.
A different matter is, when you combine it with land, your own water resources, your own electricity production, your own food supply. You are then in control of your own supply chain. You could even help others sustain themselves by barter.
Only a total environmental destruction, by radiation, by long periods of bad weather, pollution, or a war of sorts (be it a shooting war or a persecution of all those who fend for themselves under the guise of national security; see Atlas Shrugged)
Those of us working on creating and expanding a parallel economy have several options to pursue. Think of it in terms of what WOOFF is doing. Farmers offer food and shelter and leisure time against 4-6 hours of work a day on an organic farm. I can tell you from experience, this is quite an interesting way of living. In one instance their was a group between 20 -30 people all traveling across the globe, meeting new people, sitting around a campfire, passing the dutchy and telling stories. Once a week on the market the grown food was sold and a portion of it was put to extras and luxurious goods.
The best asset you have is you. So, it makes sense to add to your assets, to develop choice.
Some have chosen to use 50 USD to build an alternative stream of income, and put this income into the development of assets. In France I have seen younger people buying large plots of land by paying the now 80-90 old geezers a monthly sum of 300 euro's as long as these old people would live.
I met a guy who was an expert on water tables and water flow in soil. During his stay he investigated that flow under the plot we were at. This way water could be better secured. But he exchanged his knowledge and power for food and shelter. That is barter in it's essence.
So it would be wise to buy gold and silver, if possible, right?
Yes, if you put it in a larger context of preparedness and independence.
So, we all should have a progress plan, where risks are identified and mitigated.
For instance, right now you have a job. And hence, an income. How much can you use to move to acquire assets?
One way to do so, would be to buy some crypto, move it into Peth Mint silver or gold coin, and move to receive delivery, when a certain quantity is reached.
Where to stash it? What happens if? How do I evade obviousness? What happens if I have to move quickly? To where?
In basic terms this is called wargaming. But it presupposes knowledge of the local operating procedures and mitigation strategies.
If worked out, train them and review on a regular basis if your plans still meet the quality of reality and functionality. With awareness raised, improvisation does not becomes a lucky draw.
Cool, thanks. I'll look into it.