I have a question regarding buying precious metals, it's an honest question. I live in Panama, and not into buying gold or silver, and to be honest, don't know where I could buy it down here.
At times I wish I could buy some, but I don't really make that much money to begin with, and I gladly pay child support, because I would do anything to make sure my son has food.
At times I think why is it that we can buy gold and silver. If these were a threat to the globalists control of the people, wouldn't they have bought or taken all of it? Like I said, it's an honest question. In no way I'm trying to discourage anybody from buying these metals.
Because of it's function. Gold and silver are commodities.
In any barter situation you would trade value for value, yes?
In this world of fiat, you are trading value for what? a debt-instrument. A debt instrument has no positive value to the debtor, only to the creditor.
So, it makes sense, to have commodities that are priced for several reasons. However, in a land without the abundance of clean water, that commodity becomes more valuable than gold and silver.
However, western merchants met with locals who were flabbergasted for their mirrors and trinkets. The merchants very much wanted resources. A trade was made, both were happy and thinking: these idiots. (hahaha)
This mechanism is perfectly described by Adam Smith: An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations.
Time-preference differs from place to place, circumstance to circumstance, cultural values and practices, religious beliefs and follows strongly the pMaslow pyramid of needs.
To understand what really happened to our natural system of trade and how it has been perverted and put into a prison box: read Coin's financial School.
I know it makes sense to have commodities that have value, other than dollar bills and coins. My question is, if gold and silver were a threat to the elite, something that would give us freedom from their debt creating industry, wouldn't they have control of it all? The gold and silver, I mean.
The commodity itself is no threat. What they did was change the rules of the game in such a way that slowly over time assets were flowing into their direction away from us. Facts are replaced by fiction. And those with a lot of fictitious currency, think they are rich. They are not, not unless they exchange their fiction for fact. And those with facts happily part with it.
This is what Texas representative Patman meant when observing in 1933 about banks: the American people will wake up one day home less on the continent their fathers conquered.
What happens when we use PM and other assets to do business? It puts a little cog in the wheel of their operation. Think of it: every asset that matters is tracked and taxed. Trinkets are not. That is why there is a divergence in asset pricing. Gold is shooting up, but capped. Silver is shooting down, but capped in a bandwidth of a ratio of 80 - 110. And it is going up and down. Pump and dump.
The best option they have to impede an awakening populace is to push an economic destruction. Great Reset. Think of the Maslow Pyramid and think of the majority of people. yes .....FF-ed if push comes to shove. With the majority enthralled in the fiction, why worry?
So, once the DS has tucked all these nice assets under it's belt, you really think they are going to be worried about gold or silver in the hands of a couple of patriots?
Enter the great reset and build back better, analogous to being in a land without clean drinking water. The little assets you have, you will gladly part with it for just a cup. So, it matters not whether you have these assets or not. The system virtually guarantees their handover.
A different matter is, when you combine it with land, your own water resources, your own electricity production, your own food supply. You are then in control of your own supply chain. You could even help others sustain themselves by barter.
Only a total environmental destruction, by radiation, by long periods of bad weather, pollution, or a war of sorts (be it a shooting war or a persecution of all those who fend for themselves under the guise of national security; see Atlas Shrugged)
Those of us working on creating and expanding a parallel economy have several options to pursue. Think of it in terms of what WOOFF is doing. Farmers offer food and shelter and leisure time against 4-6 hours of work a day on an organic farm. I can tell you from experience, this is quite an interesting way of living. In one instance their was a group between 20 -30 people all traveling across the globe, meeting new people, sitting around a campfire, passing the dutchy and telling stories. Once a week on the market the grown food was sold and a portion of it was put to extras and luxurious goods.
The best asset you have is you. So, it makes sense to add to your assets, to develop choice.
Some have chosen to use 50 USD to build an alternative stream of income, and put this income into the development of assets. In France I have seen younger people buying large plots of land by paying the now 80-90 old geezers a monthly sum of 300 euro's as long as these old people would live.
I met a guy who was an expert on water tables and water flow in soil. During his stay he investigated that flow under the plot we were at. This way water could be better secured. But he exchanged his knowledge and power for food and shelter. That is barter in it's essence.
I have a question regarding buying precious metals, it's an honest question. I live in Panama, and not into buying gold or silver, and to be honest, don't know where I could buy it down here.
At times I wish I could buy some, but I don't really make that much money to begin with, and I gladly pay child support, because I would do anything to make sure my son has food.
At times I think why is it that we can buy gold and silver. If these were a threat to the globalists control of the people, wouldn't they have bought or taken all of it? Like I said, it's an honest question. In no way I'm trying to discourage anybody from buying these metals.
It’s a good question.
Because of it's function. Gold and silver are commodities.
In any barter situation you would trade value for value, yes?
In this world of fiat, you are trading value for what? a debt-instrument. A debt instrument has no positive value to the debtor, only to the creditor.
So, it makes sense, to have commodities that are priced for several reasons. However, in a land without the abundance of clean water, that commodity becomes more valuable than gold and silver.
However, western merchants met with locals who were flabbergasted for their mirrors and trinkets. The merchants very much wanted resources. A trade was made, both were happy and thinking: these idiots. (hahaha)
This mechanism is perfectly described by Adam Smith: An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations.
Time-preference differs from place to place, circumstance to circumstance, cultural values and practices, religious beliefs and follows strongly the pMaslow pyramid of needs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs
To understand what really happened to our natural system of trade and how it has been perverted and put into a prison box: read Coin's financial School.
I know it makes sense to have commodities that have value, other than dollar bills and coins. My question is, if gold and silver were a threat to the elite, something that would give us freedom from their debt creating industry, wouldn't they have control of it all? The gold and silver, I mean.
The commodity itself is no threat. What they did was change the rules of the game in such a way that slowly over time assets were flowing into their direction away from us. Facts are replaced by fiction. And those with a lot of fictitious currency, think they are rich. They are not, not unless they exchange their fiction for fact. And those with facts happily part with it.
This is what Texas representative Patman meant when observing in 1933 about banks: the American people will wake up one day home less on the continent their fathers conquered.
What happens when we use PM and other assets to do business? It puts a little cog in the wheel of their operation. Think of it: every asset that matters is tracked and taxed. Trinkets are not. That is why there is a divergence in asset pricing. Gold is shooting up, but capped. Silver is shooting down, but capped in a bandwidth of a ratio of 80 - 110. And it is going up and down. Pump and dump.
The best option they have to impede an awakening populace is to push an economic destruction. Great Reset. Think of the Maslow Pyramid and think of the majority of people. yes .....FF-ed if push comes to shove. With the majority enthralled in the fiction, why worry?
See also Pickety, arguing no real assets are needed, but debt is more than enough. The whole WEF crowd was riding high on this idea. https://mises.org/library/thomas-piketty-inequality-and-capital
So, once the DS has tucked all these nice assets under it's belt, you really think they are going to be worried about gold or silver in the hands of a couple of patriots?
Enter the great reset and build back better, analogous to being in a land without clean drinking water. The little assets you have, you will gladly part with it for just a cup. So, it matters not whether you have these assets or not. The system virtually guarantees their handover.
A different matter is, when you combine it with land, your own water resources, your own electricity production, your own food supply. You are then in control of your own supply chain. You could even help others sustain themselves by barter.
Only a total environmental destruction, by radiation, by long periods of bad weather, pollution, or a war of sorts (be it a shooting war or a persecution of all those who fend for themselves under the guise of national security; see Atlas Shrugged)
Those of us working on creating and expanding a parallel economy have several options to pursue. Think of it in terms of what WOOFF is doing. Farmers offer food and shelter and leisure time against 4-6 hours of work a day on an organic farm. I can tell you from experience, this is quite an interesting way of living. In one instance their was a group between 20 -30 people all traveling across the globe, meeting new people, sitting around a campfire, passing the dutchy and telling stories. Once a week on the market the grown food was sold and a portion of it was put to extras and luxurious goods.
The best asset you have is you. So, it makes sense to add to your assets, to develop choice.
Some have chosen to use 50 USD to build an alternative stream of income, and put this income into the development of assets. In France I have seen younger people buying large plots of land by paying the now 80-90 old geezers a monthly sum of 300 euro's as long as these old people would live.
I met a guy who was an expert on water tables and water flow in soil. During his stay he investigated that flow under the plot we were at. This way water could be better secured. But he exchanged his knowledge and power for food and shelter. That is barter in it's essence.
So it would be wise to buy gold and silver, if possible, right?