Thomas authorizing, say, flaying, drawing and quartering, death by 1000 cuts, or breaking on the wheel as a means of execution.
I was actually expecting to see Thomas essentially saying this, when I cautiously clicked on this Opinion and read it from top to bottom.
There has to be a new standard of journalistic ethics that overs an opinion article, where the journalist proclaims something they clearly cannot justify from the piece, but more importantly they dont even believe it themselves. The second part is important because this journalist clearly does not believe Thomas is the Chief Justice, and yet, by penning it under "opinion" it becomes impossible to blame them.
There should be a journalistic ethics that encompasses this and all other aspects of journalism that is dishonest by intention.
I was actually expecting to see Thomas essentially saying this, when I cautiously clicked on this Opinion and read it from top to bottom.
There has to be a new standard of journalistic ethics that overs an opinion article, where the journalist proclaims something they clearly cannot justify from the piece, but more importantly they dont even believe it themselves. The second part is important because this journalist clearly does not believe Thomas is the Chief Justice, and yet, by penning it under "opinion" it becomes impossible to blame them.
There should be a journalistic ethics that encompasses this and all other aspects of journalism that is dishonest by intention.