A reasonable, responsible government that actually cared about people's lives would not be screaming "HORSE DEWORMER, HORSE DEWORMER!"
A reasonable, responsible government would be saying exactly this:
"Even though ivermectin has not been approved by the FDA to treat covid-19, there is still some evidence to suggest it can help reduce the severity and duration of illness. If you attempt to use Ivermectin formulated for large farm animals, make sure to reduce the dosage accordingly to adjust for human body weight so you do do not overdose on medication."
But no, they started screaming, "HORSE DEWORMER!!!"
I hate these people.
https://www.durvet.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Ivermectin-Paste_Bimeda_112015_SDS.pdf
Checkmate. This is the MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET for Ivermectin paste. The Material Safety Data Sheet outlines safety hazards around ingestion of a substance, and must include safety hazards for humans associated with all sources, not just for horses.
It lists some proprietary ingredients, and EXPLICITLY STATES they are not classified as dangerous.
That is a dangerous, bullshit, red-herring, gaslighting argument. You have been debunked.
It should be ashamed of itself for supporting the cabal vax control mechanism.
It's just performing it's function. If it didn't it would be replaced by another. Shills have to shill.
I'm actually impressed that you pulled out the MSDS for this. I have a lot of experience reading these.
Can you tell me exactly which part you say, "EXPLICITLY STATES" that these proprietary ingredients are not classified as dangerous?
Section 2.1 is the part that talks about hazards, and it pretty clearly states that there are hazards involved with taking this. Which is why it gets the H203 classification.
3.2 talks about the proprietary ingredients, and states they're not classified. If they were confirmed not to be dangerous, they would be classified. Not being classified means it wasn't tested.
Which isn't uncommon in inactive ingredients in medications not designed for humans. Because they aren't going to risk testing things in people that they don't reasonably expect people to eat.
That is per 1910.1200 a5.iii, which discusses chemicals they don't need to label.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/29/1910.1200
If they WERE dangerous, they'd be a real big hurry to classify them. Since they are not dangerous, they couldn't be bothered to. That's the way it works. The squeaky wheel gets the grease, man.
If they CARED if it was dangerous for people, then it would be tested and classified. If they expect people to eat it, they will classify it. No question. End of story. Even if they believed it was safe.
Even water has an MSDS sheet, and we literally die without it. It's classified because people will consume it.
https://fscimage.fishersci.com/msds/00199.htm
They do not care about classifying everything in horse medication, because they didn't expect people to eat horse medication.
There is no hurry or requirement that they test proprietary chemicals designed for and tested for horses if it's exclusively being used in a medication not designed for people.
Testing chemicals on people requires people volunteers. If there is no reasonable expectation that people will be consuming a chemical, they not only WON'T test it on people, but they wouldn't even get approval from the ethics board to do so.
Human testing requires ENORMOUS justification. Legally, ethically, and scientifically.
The fact that you're choosing to eat this stuff does not mean they were expected to predict that people would be eating this stuff. There's not an MSDS for some of the stuff in Tide Pods, either.
They're obligated to care if it's dangerous to people. PEOPLE HAVE TO HANDLE THIS STUFF WHEN THEY ARE MAKING IT.
THATS WHAT THE MSDS IS FOR LMFAO.
Your logic is so ass backwards.
This explains how Corminaty was approved by the FDA without these tests.