When doctors, EMS, First Responders, etc check to see if a person is either alive or dead, what's the first thing they check for? Their heartbeat. When there's no heartbeat, they're presumed dead. When there is, it's called a sign of life. When your unborn baby has a heartbeat, it's a sign of life. - The Great Awakening

482

When doctors, EMS, First Responders, etc check to see if a person is either alive or dead, what's the first thing they check for? Their heartbeat. When there's no heartbeat, they're presumed dead. When there is, it's called a sign of life. When your unborn baby has a heartbeat, it's a sign of life.

posted 3 years ago by mizzAmerica45 3 years ago by mizzAmerica45 +482 / -0

When a person's 'sign of life' quits.....it's because of one of the following reason:

They suffered from natural causes and no longer had the ability to continue surviving in their aged body.
Because of some medical reason in which they couldn't overcome.
Murder.

There's nothing natural about removing parts of a baby out of a woman and therefore killing it. There's nothing medical about removing parts of a baby out of a woman and therefore killing it. There is, however, something called murder when you end a person/baby's 'sign of life', by removing their body parts and therefore killing it.

It doesn't take intelligence to figure this out. Just morals. We unfortunately lack a massive amount of both nowadays.

46 comments

46 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (46)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– frazzledrip 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1

RIght. re read my comment lol

"Can't really tell about the latter though, until well into the pregnancy so, that would negate me "seeing it" in the end."

permalink parent save report block reply

– wetsock 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

She probably told you because she felt guilty

– frazzledrip 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Maybe, she honestly wasn't really the sharpest tool in the shed ; a little ditzy if I'm being honest. One of those types who sometimes doesn't clue in they've just made a fairly large faux pas. I think she totally clued out / forgot I was adopted lol.