Actually all trajectories are developed based in the moon having surface gravitational anomalies. Mascons. Luna wasn't part of Sputnik program. It also wasn't called Luna until several years later. It followed, so more likely 6th launch or so. First of three they sent to the moon, one of which got sent to the sun because the gravitational surface anomalies had yet to be mapped.
Until further notice you are restricted from landing any vehicles on the lunar surface.
I believe it was you who stated that the third satellite after Sputnik 2 went to the Moon. I corrected you about it, and now you are trying to correct me? Not very convincing. Yes, there are MASCONs, but they are aberrations of the central force field. You have to have the central force field, which defines the center of gravity. Even Earth has MASCONs, but they are mostly swamped by the central field strength. Look, if you have a real revelation, reveal it. Reiterating known facts about the Moon is a bore.
Actually all trajectories are developed based in the moon having surface gravitational anomalies. Mascons. Luna wasn't part of Sputnik program. It also wasn't called Luna until several years later. It followed, so more likely 6th launch or so. First of three they sent to the moon, one of which got sent to the sun because the gravitational surface anomalies had yet to be mapped. Until further notice you are restricted from landing any vehicles on the lunar surface.
I believe it was you who stated that the third satellite after Sputnik 2 went to the Moon. I corrected you about it, and now you are trying to correct me? Not very convincing. Yes, there are MASCONs, but they are aberrations of the central force field. You have to have the central force field, which defines the center of gravity. Even Earth has MASCONs, but they are mostly swamped by the central field strength. Look, if you have a real revelation, reveal it. Reiterating known facts about the Moon is a bore.