In the United States, no one regulates the news media or journalists for accuracy and bias. They police themselves and operate within existing libel laws.
Let's not forget about Section 230 which protects all the "platforms" from libel suits. We'd see a lot less propaganda if they were considered publishers, which is what they are.
Well their use of the mockingbird under Barry was legalized and given money to continue to propagandize the American public. That may be coming back to bite them though as they are trying to scare Mr. Baxter into removing material on his website that they don't like. I believe what he is saying but it's hard to claim libel or slander when it's the truth.
In the United States, no one regulates the news media or journalists for accuracy and bias. They police themselves and operate within existing libel laws.
Big media companies parroting obvious propaganda should not be considered free speech
Let's not forget about Section 230 which protects all the "platforms" from libel suits. We'd see a lot less propaganda if they were considered publishers, which is what they are.
Well their use of the mockingbird under Barry was legalized and given money to continue to propagandize the American public. That may be coming back to bite them though as they are trying to scare Mr. Baxter into removing material on his website that they don't like. I believe what he is saying but it's hard to claim libel or slander when it's the truth.