none of what you said has anything to do with what I said. Which is that basic hygiene practices have been responsible for the eradication of most diseases. I think even vaccines of the past were questionable in their efficacy from what we now know of the medical establishment.
I 100% agree with you on the food pyramid. It is ass backwards and grains are greatly over represented. This doesn't mean the answer is a diet of raw meat lol. You can do that if you want an increased chance of parasites and salmonella. Animal fats can be obtained just the same from properly cooking your meat... and even saving and reusing the rendered fat for other dishes.
The health and obesity epidemic is also muti-faceted. In addition to this over representation of grain on the faulty food pyramid is an increasingly sedentary lifestyle and lack of any physical training or effort which is where the excess of carbs would actually get used. Diet is the most important though as it is impossible to outwork a bad diet ie calories in/calories out.
All I'm saying is if you go deeper, you can go back to the 1800s and learn about a French scientist named Louis Pasteur who started the whole idea that bacteria caused disease (Hence "Pasteurization"). It's what the entire ideology of our medical and food establishment is based on. If you read into the history you realize he never proved anything. He was a quack with royal connections.
What if bacteria is good? What if we are made up entirely of bacteria? What if bacteria are found at the sites of diseased tissue because it's cleaning and recycling it?
Maybe our entire paradigm is wrong. Maybe we don't have to worry about salmonella or parasites. Maybe those are natural and our bodies are fully equipped to utilize them as long as you provide enough bacteria to keep your body healthy.
Maybe killing your food with heat means you're destroying all the nutrients and enzymes in said meat that your body needs to digest it. So now your body has to leech and manufacture whatever enzymes and nutrients you have in order to digest this dead meat and expel it.
Does heating up fats sound like a good way to maintain the fat's integrity? Or maybe it makes it toxic? Fat is extremely important so we need to get this right or nothing else matters.
I wouldn't trust convention. I've found if the masses believe it, it's probably wrong. Our bodies evolved for millions of years on raw meat. Cooked meat has only been around for a split second in evolutionary terms.
There have been plenty of studies on present day hunter-gatherers and their raw meat diet and health. Eskimos ferment their meat for months and enjoy it as a medicine and delicacy. You can ferment raw milk and make Kefir. You can ferment cabbage and make Sauerkraut. Fermenting just adds to the bacteria count and subsequently makes everything healthier....hmm.
none of what you said has anything to do with what I said. Which is that basic hygiene practices have been responsible for the eradication of most diseases. I think even vaccines of the past were questionable in their efficacy from what we now know of the medical establishment.
I 100% agree with you on the food pyramid. It is ass backwards and grains are greatly over represented. This doesn't mean the answer is a diet of raw meat lol. You can do that if you want an increased chance of parasites and salmonella. Animal fats can be obtained just the same from properly cooking your meat... and even saving and reusing the rendered fat for other dishes.
The health and obesity epidemic is also muti-faceted. In addition to this over representation of grain on the faulty food pyramid is an increasingly sedentary lifestyle and lack of any physical training or effort which is where the excess of carbs would actually get used. Diet is the most important though as it is impossible to outwork a bad diet ie calories in/calories out.
All I'm saying is if you go deeper, you can go back to the 1800s and learn about a French scientist named Louis Pasteur who started the whole idea that bacteria caused disease (Hence "Pasteurization"). It's what the entire ideology of our medical and food establishment is based on. If you read into the history you realize he never proved anything. He was a quack with royal connections.
What if bacteria is good? What if we are made up entirely of bacteria? What if bacteria are found at the sites of diseased tissue because it's cleaning and recycling it?
Maybe our entire paradigm is wrong. Maybe we don't have to worry about salmonella or parasites. Maybe those are natural and our bodies are fully equipped to utilize them as long as you provide enough bacteria to keep your body healthy.
Maybe killing your food with heat means you're destroying all the nutrients and enzymes in said meat that your body needs to digest it. So now your body has to leech and manufacture whatever enzymes and nutrients you have in order to digest this dead meat and expel it.
Does heating up fats sound like a good way to maintain the fat's integrity? Or maybe it makes it toxic? Fat is extremely important so we need to get this right or nothing else matters.
I wouldn't trust convention. I've found if the masses believe it, it's probably wrong. Our bodies evolved for millions of years on raw meat. Cooked meat has only been around for a split second in evolutionary terms.
There have been plenty of studies on present day hunter-gatherers and their raw meat diet and health. Eskimos ferment their meat for months and enjoy it as a medicine and delicacy. You can ferment raw milk and make Kefir. You can ferment cabbage and make Sauerkraut. Fermenting just adds to the bacteria count and subsequently makes everything healthier....hmm.