So because someone wrote a study or an article about it, it makes it true?
There have been plenty of studies over the years saying smoking wasn't harmful.
Leftists put out studies and articles that supposedly support them all the time. What makes YOUR stuff any more legitimate? Other than you just WANTING them to be true?
I am qualified enough to point you to many people who do have relevant qualifications. Note: I have not given you my opinion of Ivermectin so I am operating well within my limits.
You, on the other hand, have no issues with rubbishing the work of many scientists. What do you know that they do not about Ivermectin?
So because someone wrote a study or an article about it, it makes it true?
There have been plenty of studies over the years saying smoking wasn't harmful.
Leftists put out studies and articles that supposedly support them all the time. What makes YOUR stuff any more legitimate? Other than you just WANTING them to be true?
No, what really counts is an unqualified individual making a post somewhere on the Internet.
True. What are your qualifications?
I am qualified enough to point you to many people who do have relevant qualifications. Note: I have not given you my opinion of Ivermectin so I am operating well within my limits.
You, on the other hand, have no issues with rubbishing the work of many scientists. What do you know that they do not about Ivermectin?
I know the pharmaceutical companies that make it are not to be trusted. At all.
I know that the "scientists" who are paid to say it's safe are not to be trusted.
Why do you trust them?