Organized Scientific Fraud: SARS-CoV-2 is an Unrestricted Bioweapon
(www.americaoutloud.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
The article tags it as a bioweapon because it was obviously constructed by man, which means there was an intent to do something with it. Maybe they planned to play with it some more and make it deadlier, but Trump tipped their hand, so they went with what they had. On the other hand, it seems all they needed for their plan to work was some new disease that they could fearmonger and then implement injections as a control procedure.
“...obviously constructed by man...”
Can you provide the proof backing this claim up? The article above didn’t. They just assumed it’s true because they said it couldn’t occur naturally. All these statements require an actual, isolated, real virus - not a computer generated model. Which no one seems to have.
Even the test used to base this entire Scamdemic on can’t even identify this supposed virus. If the virus was, indeed isolated, then the test would be accurate, but it’s not, therefore there is no isolation.
Furthermore, the mockingbird media doesn’t need a “real” virus to fan the flame of fear. They can conjure up the idea that there is a real virus out there killing people out of thin air and blast that message at us 24/7 until we all start believing it (think Wag the Dog). Don’t forget, the flu disappeared. The cold....gone.
I def agree with you that Trump forced their hand and probably rushed them. I don’t think they had what they wanted yet. Then decided to run with the “Novel virus killing everybody” narrative. They couldn’t allow Trump to win again. But they definitely didn’t need a real virus to accomplish instilling fear into the world in order to set them up for the real kill shot.
I was speaking on the basis of a lot of things I've read over the past nearly two years, not one particular scientific study that I can recover and produce for you.
If it couldn't occur naturally, how else would it happen? Have you seen all the reports about Fauci funding gain-of-function research? What do you think that was all about?
"If it couldn't occur naturally, how else would it happen?"
It sounds like you're still stuck in the false dichotomy. Why isn't it a viable option that "covid" doesn't exist and that the flu and the cold were hijacked, coupled with a media marketing campaign of epic proportions, and every other angle of lies they've pushed, to create the mass panic?
Once this option is eliminated, then you have a true "If not this, then that" dichotomy.
"Have you seen all the reports about Fauci funding gain-of-function research? What do you think that was all about?"
Good question. Yes, I have. What we see, however, is merely all the "attempts" and investments made into GoF research, but we haven't seen any cold hard facts regarding their succeeding.
If "covid" was, indeed, isolated, then the man made sequences would be EASILY exposed, but those man made sequences have not been exposed - only from a computer generated model, not an actual, isolated virus sample.
I think Trump forced their hand for sure - in more ways than one. One of those ways was in the fact that they didn't have the actual virus ready yet (another reason for wanting 5 more years of lockdowns). So they had there little Event 201 round table meeting, and moved forward with their "simulated" pandemic. This, at minimum, explains why there haven't been any Flu deaths or Cold deaths (the death counts were hijacked and moved over to the "covid" column), and all the inflated numbers, incentivized doctors, faulty tests, etc etc...
Good discussion, Fren. :)
"It sounds like you're still stuck in the false dichotomy. Why isn't it a viable option that "covid" doesn't exist and that the flu and the cold were hijacked, coupled with a media marketing campaign of epic proportions, and every other angle of lies they've pushed, to create the mass panic?"
I know an ER doc who, in the early days of the virus, talked about symptoms he'd never seen before, especially blood clots in the lungs, which led to the use of ventilators. He acknowledged that comorbidities made a significant contribution to the patient's outcome. He initially seemed stumped by what they were seeing and later said they had to come up with a new protocol to treat it: Hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and a third item, which IIRC was zinc.
I agree that Trump forced their hand, that the flu and cold were hijacked, that the media campaign created the public reaction of absolute fear and terror, and that the pandemic was simulated (hoaxed). However, based on the ER doc's experience, I believe that some new disease has been floating around, that it was likely created in a lab, that it's relatively harmless to anyone healthy, and that, just like the regular flu, it's only a significant problem for someone whose body is already debilitated by comorbidities and/or a weakened immune system. I also believe that the deaths of the relatively young and otherwise healthy who've gone to a hospital with this disease are a result of the Remdesivir and ventilator treatments being inflicted on them by corrupt practitioners at all levels of the system.
If I didn't know this ER doc, I'd probably agree with you 100%. I do agree that this has been a good discussion. 😺