nobody in the history of the the world has ever successfully used a "study" to find any long term problem with any vaccine.

therefore, any time a "scientist" claims they "can't find the evidence" that vaccines cause X,

i simply ask them to demonstrate their proficiency in using a study to find any vaccine problem, and invariably they fail to demonstrate proficiency and/or competence.

one "anecdotal" white buffalo is all it takes to debunk 10,000 "scientific studies" that "can't find the evidence" that white buffalo exist.

"anecdotes" are considered "proof" all of the time, in a court of law.

yes, your honor, i "anecdotally" eye-witnessed the defendant commit the crime.

what "isn't" proof, is a scientific study, because we all know that scientists can put whatever data they want into their study, or omit any data they want, to get the pre-determined results they want.

and besides, every atheist knows you can't "prove a negative"

therefore you can't actually prove "vaccines DO NOT cause X".

why does Frank DeStefano still have a job, after publishing this FRAUD?

http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14754936/

"...i regret my coauthors and i omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in journal Pediatrics. the omitted data suggested AA males who received MMR vaccine before age 36 mo were at increased risk for autism..."

~ Dr William Thompson, CDC whistleblower

https://i.redd.it/1rb482xb9ty41.png