Unless they did a recent edit to that case, it doesn't say anything about this image. The entire case revolves around a prisoner of war . Unless I'm missing something when reading it.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/2/
Well fren, if none of us are "that guy", then these types of things will get posted. While this post wasn't necessarily nefarious, it wasn't checkable thus may not be factual. But that opens the door to nefarious things get posted, and maybe even stickied judging by the diligence of some mods. Not knocking mods as I know they must be up to their necks, but we need real checkable info to make intelligent, informed statements and arguments for off the forum talk.
Maybe this is my ignorance speaking, but the use of all-caps, phrasing like "earn a living", and the overall format/presentation, all points to this being yet another half-assed "meme" and not any kind of real legal document.
agreed, that's why I searched for the formal case document to clarify, but at the same time I also first read it as just someone's personal interpretation of the case.
Unless they did a recent edit to that case, it doesn't say anything about this image. The entire case revolves around a prisoner of war . Unless I'm missing something when reading it. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/2/
Ditto, I was just about to post the same, it's either been removed, which I'd tend to doubt, or it's malarkey.
Yeah hate being "that guy" but I also don't want our side using their tactics.
Ya but if more ppl were ‘that guy’ then more of these would be verified before they’re stickied...
Keep up the great work, Patriot!
Well fren, if none of us are "that guy", then these types of things will get posted. While this post wasn't necessarily nefarious, it wasn't checkable thus may not be factual. But that opens the door to nefarious things get posted, and maybe even stickied judging by the diligence of some mods. Not knocking mods as I know they must be up to their necks, but we need real checkable info to make intelligent, informed statements and arguments for off the forum talk.
Maybe this is my ignorance speaking, but the use of all-caps, phrasing like "earn a living", and the overall format/presentation, all points to this being yet another half-assed "meme" and not any kind of real legal document.
agreed, that's why I searched for the formal case document to clarify, but at the same time I also first read it as just someone's personal interpretation of the case.