So Let Me Ask
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (147)
sorted by:
Wrong!
One of the main reasons skyscrapers are made of steel is because they are NOT subject to catastrophic failure due to fire.
Steel is the best conductor of heat. It disperses the heat throughout the entire structure, making it unlikely the original area of the fire would be a point of failure.
Those fires were not hot enough to even WEAKEN steel to the point that the fires could bring down such a building.
This is WHY no such building has ever collapsed in the history of steel-frame buildings. On 9/11, those 3 buildings were brought down with explosives and/or incendiaries that were pre-installed.
Yeah, and nevermind the seemingly molten steel spewing out of the side of the building. Even if jet fuel weakened the beams, itd only drop some floors, slowed and turned to the side as it hits non heated beams. The entire damn buildings steel didn't heat up from the top up from jet fuel ffs lol
I think you mean top-down, but yeah.
Setting aside whether or not jet fuel actually could take down a building on its own, "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" is the line that is repeated over and over by people who want to paint all 9/11 investigation as crazy conspiracy theory. If you mention jet fuel, normies are instantly going to tune you out. If you want to actually get through to them, there are plenty of other convincing angles you can use without bringing up jet fuel.