So Let Me Ask
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (147)
sorted by:
the level of stupid coming from you is just astonishing...
you belch out "newtonian physics" as if you've won some contest with he mere mention of a concept all while not being able to grasp even the most basic understanding of what you are spouting.
lets keep things easy, just for you... "objects in motion tend to stay in motion"
when the damaged area fails and the millions of tons of building above start falling downward through the damaged area... it tends to stay in motion. nobody has ever designed buildings to "catch" the top 1/3rd as it free falls into the bottom 2/3rds.
not one.
the only thing stopping that much mass once it's in motion is something with substantially more mass... in this case, the earth.
when you compromise the structural integrity of the entire system, by compromising the central core and severing all the zig zag truss connections between the core and the outer skin, there is no "resistance" to slow or stop that much mass in motion.
you've never actually put any thought into this at all, you just hear faggots regurgitate "iT viOlAtES NEwToniAn PhYSicS" and assume its true without ever once understanding it yourself.
i'm glad i could explain it to you so you can stop sounding so retarded all the time.
you're welcome.
holy fuck you're dumb...
so you think that because the bottom of the building weighs more then the top of the building can't fuck it up as it falls into it?
LOL
there is no "force pushing up" it's a compromised system, it's a building that has had it's top cut off... it's not a matter of mass vs mass it's a matter of falling mass impacting a static structural support system that either can or cannot "catch" the weight of the building above.
this happens on a floor by floor basis.
once the building's top sections are falling they are going to blow out each floor they impact... it's the single floor vs the entire weight of the building above with inertia behind it.
once the fires cooked the damaged areas long enough, it reached a point where it could no longer hold the weight of the building above and that damaged area failed, allowing the building above to begin freefalling.
once you have that much weight in motion, you're asking the floor directly below the damaged area to "catch" that building.
never going to happen, it just becomes more weight that is falling into the floors below.