So far as that 2nd clip, Flight 175 came in from the other side. The explosion is blasting through the building. And that clip actually shows the plane incoming from the upper right...
EYEWITNESS AT PENTAGON ON 9/11 SAYS THERE WAS NO PLANE DEBRIS AND ACTUAL VIDEO OF CRUISE MISSILE
February 11, 2020 Russ Winter Articles by Russ Winter, Crime, Hidden History, US News
Very strong evidence including eyewitnesses and video - No Plane. Also the width of a plane's wings is > 100 feet. The width of the damage was 65 feet.
Yeah, I saw the video elsewhere. It is BS. The length of the supposed missile is about the height of the Pentagon, which is 71 feet. There are no cruise missiles of that length today. There was also no indication of wings or stabilizers, which hints at how crappy the image was. The likelihood is that the camera was seeing a sun glare off the fuselage of the 767. It would help if you guys would actually study what you are pointing at.
So far as that 2nd clip, Flight 175 came in from the other side. The explosion is blasting through the building. And that clip actually shows the plane incoming from the upper right...
EYEWITNESS AT PENTAGON ON 9/11 SAYS THERE WAS NO PLANE DEBRIS AND ACTUAL VIDEO OF CRUISE MISSILE
February 11, 2020 Russ Winter Articles by Russ Winter, Crime, Hidden History, US News
Very strong evidence including eyewitnesses and video - No Plane. Also the width of a plane's wings is > 100 feet. The width of the damage was 65 feet.
https://www.winterwatch.net/2020/02/april-gallop-eyewitness-at-pentagon-on-911-says-no-plane-debris/
Army Major: “I Have Proof That A Missile Hit Pentagon On 9/11” https://newspunch.com/army-general-missile-hit-pentagon-911/
VIDEO OF CRUISE MISSILE STRIKING THE PENTAGON
https://defendingthetruth.com/threads/the-pentagon-on-911-a-cruise-missile-struck-the-building.14045/
Yeah, I saw the video elsewhere. It is BS. The length of the supposed missile is about the height of the Pentagon, which is 71 feet. There are no cruise missiles of that length today. There was also no indication of wings or stabilizers, which hints at how crappy the image was. The likelihood is that the camera was seeing a sun glare off the fuselage of the 767. It would help if you guys would actually study what you are pointing at.