This crap is beyond obvious.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
I can't seem to find the better-quality version of the video I mentioned. This is it, but the quality is horrendous: https://defendingthetruth.com/threads/update-a-cruise-missile-slammed-into-the-pentagon-on-911.27808/
The thread does show the model of the cruise missile used.
Well, one thing is for sure: it wasn't a cruise missile. The scale is all wrong. The streak of light was about as long as the Pentagon was tall, which would have made it 71 feet long. An ALCM is only 20 feet long. No signs of wings, which means the streak of light is probably exactly that: a sunlight glint off the fuselage of the 767. The camera resolution is crappy.
You guys will never learn. The evidence is right in front of your faces and your ignorance blinds you to it.
Have you ever seen what happens to an object at high speed on a VCR tape? It lengthens as the frames can't resolve the image correctly.
Collect your shekels for your post.
Then the image cannot overlap itself during the motion, which is what it was doing.
I happened to work for most of my career right across the street from the building in which the ALCMs were manufactured. Dummy shapes would be in the cross-hallways leading to one of the cafeterias. It wasn't an ALCM.
Or, go find the missing passengers.
I would consider Christopher Bollyn the most eminent investigator of these details. You may be right that the missile in question is not an ACLM, although the other possibility, the Global Hawk, has an obvious wingspan -- which is not apparent in the video.
The only engine part found inside the Pentagon was an unidentified turbine disc, but Bollyn was able to determine that it was NOT part of a Honeywell engine for a 757. You can read his findings here: https://www.bollyn.com/is-the-pentagon-mystery-disc-from-a-global-hawk-2
I would suggest that we don't know EVERYTHING about every single part ever installed on every single cruise missile, engine et al, and perhaps a one-off design for a very specific covert purpose may have unusual non-standard parts.
At any rate, before the floors of the Pentagon collapsed opening up a much larger hole, there was a very small, round entry point into the building consistent with a cruise missile...and not a 757. The fireball visible from the security camera is an exact match for a cruise missile detonation. In addition, there is a photograph of a 757-like plane exiting the Pentagon airspace immediately following the impact.
I challenge you to explain "the evidence right in front of our faces," and ignorance blinding us. Clearly, there was no debris from, or damage consistent with, a 757. On the other hand, there is good evidence of something quite nefarious.
I'm out.