My only issue with your statements are that for the uninformed you make conclusions like "... for the purpose of defending a traitorous movement.... in order to protect and expand slavery" without any evidence (source). We have to take your word on that, right?

How about if I said "The North's actions were mainly driven by a deep state group involved with human trafficking that wanted access to the south's labor pool", or somesuch, and didn't provide any evidence. You would have to take my word on that, or disregard it completely. Bad example, but hopefully you get my point.

The little I have heard from those pushing back against the war being purely about slavery was that it was a war resisting federal governmental overreach that infringe on states rights. If framed in this way, your conclusion quoted above seems off.

Positive examples are not necessary when the negative conclusion isn't supported.

I'll call it there, as I haven't reviewed your prior links, just replying to help aid your effectiveness in sharing. Thanks.

edit: tl;dr - If you assert something as fact and not opinion, you should provide a link