Answer to question: Why doesn't the vaccine hurt everyone. (57sec.)
(www.bitchute.com)
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Each vax under EAU has four different dosages, one being a placebo indicating that the population is in fact the clinical trail.
If this was 57 seconds, why didn't you just type it out?
now, your just soda to me.
Not all of us have jobs that allow cell phone use. Video eats data, which is expensive as well.
4 types of vaccine that appear to present differing dosages…she’s speculating that depending on your reaction to the shot could be dependent on what dosage you were given. Interesting site she shared: clinicaltrials.gov
Nice. Thanks.
With all the 50 dollar unlimited plans,who the hell is paying for their data usage these days?
The pepe next to your username.... Where did you get it?
I made that! I edited original pepe to have glassy bloodshot eyes and a sad smile, like Shia Lebouf's mug shot. Then posted it to the chans years ago!! It's called pepe_deargod.jpg in My Documents. I've never seen it in the wild before. This is a trip
Edit - NM... seeing it on a computer now instead of a phone and it's a pepe smoking a blunt! Hahaha that's not mine.
He just showed up one day.the admin gave him to me.
Hmmmmm!! Thanks
you must have more time on your hands if you have the time to type.
very very interesting
It's a very simple awnser. They are experimenting with different dosages and reagents in different batches.
Those that get the death shot have an almost immediate visceral reactiom; those that get a lighter or experimental dosage have different side effects.
Never touch that fucking shit it's all posion.
So I just went to the site, found ivermectin as a treatment and the study I selected said 0% adverse reactions but wouldn’t provide any results of the study because, “Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.”
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT04425850
it shows the control group had 11 adverse events, but the group that actually received ivermectin had 0 adverse events. even more of a reason it could be helpful.
Yes, thank you for clarifying!
This explains a lot.
There’s hundreds of vaccine studies on this website. This is a big and scary claim to make. Has anyone been able to pinpoint the study she is referring to? What are they claiming is the size of the study?
Aren’t the clinical trials different from the EUA? As much as I want to believe all of this, I am having a hard time imagining that at a huge scale they had different doses and placebos. The clinical trials are typically smaller in scale, where in my mind, it makes sense to try different doses to settle the doses you would use for the EUA. My understanding is that is what they did, BUT, I thought they ended up giving the placebo group real doses because of the “dangers” of Covid.
I’m not saying this isn’t real. But out of all the things I’ve heard about these vaccines, this sort of feels like misinformation. And you can look at any of my posts, I am definitely not supportive of these things. I’ve misinterpreted things and stated things incorrectly. We need to be spot on with our claims. We are fighting an information war.
It was her opinion, and I believe she got her information from: clinical trials.gov That is the webb site she cites. You may want to check out.
its there, about the clinical trials, there were 4 different shots given to the people who volunteered. so that part is correct. however I do not know what the 'standard of care' is for in the wild outside the clinical trials, that information is what would be more compelling to say they are still running trials.