Sundance at the Conservative Treehouse often mentions that the Washington Post is a mouthpiece for the CIA and State Department, NOT the Department of Defense or Whitehouse. With that in mind, I find this story very interesting as well. It sounds like a turf war between the CIA/State Dept and the DOD/"Whitehouse".
I think this may prove to be very inderdasting as well!
Yeah, and he says that, I forget the specifics, but NYT is the mouthpiece for the State Department, and CNN for Capitol Hill Dems? DOJ/FBI?
I donât doubt these assertions/details, but ultimately theyâre all Deep State, and theyâre all aligned against the people.
Also, tangentially, CTH/Sundance is the most conspicuously doomy place Iâve found on the conservative internet. Mention Durham there, and everybody seems to go into hysterical, ritualized fits of disappointment at that ânothingburger.â And I have to suspect any discussion of Q and/or devolution are banned there, as Iâve never seen mention of either. Now I could be missing something, as I admittedly donât spend much time on that site, but every time I do, I just feel sorry for those despairing doomers who have no idea whatâs brewing⊠because it appears nobody is allowed to tell them.
I first found CTH before the 2016 election and I have to say, Sundance is a phenomenal researcher. I learned more about SpyGate thanks to SD than anywhere else on the interenet.
He had put together all of his research and went to DC to present it and was totally shut down. I think that was extremely deflating for him. That's why no one wants to talk about Durham over there anymore.
When I found GA.win I found great people with great insights and I love how everyone contributes. CTH is on my list to check on occasion, but I agree, its become a little too doomy for me.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts BasedInFact.đđ» Always appreciated.
I recall that same episode, too. (There was some name he had for his truth bomb, something like the âbig uglyâ, but that wasnât it⊠anywaysâŠ)
Sounds like your progression is like mine.
I now think that one of the reasons why Sundance didnât get traction during those waning months of the Trump administration is that the time wasnât right for that damning info to come out - it is so much deeper than even Sundance suspected, and it will all come out when the time is right.
Absent âthe planâ (and the devolution scenario seems to describe what that might look like), nothing that has transpired makes sense. (And Iâm not just saying that as in âI donât like itâ, but just actorsâ actions, especially PDJTâs, donât make logical sense.) Iâm surprised someone astute and informed like Sundance doesnât at least critically consider these scenarios - it just seems like the notion of a âQ planâ is such a black swan that many wonât even consider it. People are so quick to dismiss it as fanciful that they wonât even consider that it is factual.
I can add no insight into whatâs transpiring here, but find it to be delightfully 5-star spicyđ¶.
Sundance at the Conservative Treehouse often mentions that the Washington Post is a mouthpiece for the CIA and State Department, NOT the Department of Defense or Whitehouse. With that in mind, I find this story very interesting as well. It sounds like a turf war between the CIA/State Dept and the DOD/"Whitehouse".
I think this may prove to be very inderdasting as well!
Yeah, and he says that, I forget the specifics, but NYT is the mouthpiece for the State Department, and CNN for Capitol Hill Dems? DOJ/FBI?
I donât doubt these assertions/details, but ultimately theyâre all Deep State, and theyâre all aligned against the people.
Also, tangentially, CTH/Sundance is the most conspicuously doomy place Iâve found on the conservative internet. Mention Durham there, and everybody seems to go into hysterical, ritualized fits of disappointment at that ânothingburger.â And I have to suspect any discussion of Q and/or devolution are banned there, as Iâve never seen mention of either. Now I could be missing something, as I admittedly donât spend much time on that site, but every time I do, I just feel sorry for those despairing doomers who have no idea whatâs brewing⊠because it appears nobody is allowed to tell them.
I agree with everything you say.
I first found CTH before the 2016 election and I have to say, Sundance is a phenomenal researcher. I learned more about SpyGate thanks to SD than anywhere else on the interenet.
He had put together all of his research and went to DC to present it and was totally shut down. I think that was extremely deflating for him. That's why no one wants to talk about Durham over there anymore.
When I found GA.win I found great people with great insights and I love how everyone contributes. CTH is on my list to check on occasion, but I agree, its become a little too doomy for me.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts BasedInFact.đđ» Always appreciated.
I recall that same episode, too. (There was some name he had for his truth bomb, something like the âbig uglyâ, but that wasnât it⊠anywaysâŠ)
Sounds like your progression is like mine.
I now think that one of the reasons why Sundance didnât get traction during those waning months of the Trump administration is that the time wasnât right for that damning info to come out - it is so much deeper than even Sundance suspected, and it will all come out when the time is right.
Absent âthe planâ (and the devolution scenario seems to describe what that might look like), nothing that has transpired makes sense. (And Iâm not just saying that as in âI donât like itâ, but just actorsâ actions, especially PDJTâs, donât make logical sense.) Iâm surprised someone astute and informed like Sundance doesnât at least critically consider these scenarios - it just seems like the notion of a âQ planâ is such a black swan that many wonât even consider it. People are so quick to dismiss it as fanciful that they wonât even consider that it is factual.
And thanks for the compliment. Likewise right back at you!