It says the whole genome was sequenced. The "no isolated virus" theories Ive seen argue that there has never been any virus isolated from an infected patient WITHOUT using a cell medium. However, by definition a virus needs a host cell in order to replicate? Not arguing, just want to get to the bottom of it like everyone else here. But I'm afraid this "no isolated virus theory" is sounding more and more like its made to make us look dumb.
yeah the anti-germ theory folks have it in their heads that since viruses must be grown on a cell medium that medium prevents you from ever having "pure virus" to analyze. they are missing the forest for the trees.
All speculative, gin up a statistical model and do cell cultures of your model. It has not been isolated. Sequencing is hypothetical, based on statistical probabilities. If they had a sample from which they could actually sequence they would have done so. Snake language.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7036342/
It says the whole genome was sequenced. The "no isolated virus" theories Ive seen argue that there has never been any virus isolated from an infected patient WITHOUT using a cell medium. However, by definition a virus needs a host cell in order to replicate? Not arguing, just want to get to the bottom of it like everyone else here. But I'm afraid this "no isolated virus theory" is sounding more and more like its made to make us look dumb.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-viruses-alive-2004/
yeah the anti-germ theory folks have it in their heads that since viruses must be grown on a cell medium that medium prevents you from ever having "pure virus" to analyze. they are missing the forest for the trees.
All speculative, gin up a statistical model and do cell cultures of your model. It has not been isolated. Sequencing is hypothetical, based on statistical probabilities. If they had a sample from which they could actually sequence they would have done so. Snake language.