Now we know who Pelosi was talking to for “assurances”. Surprise, surprise.
(media.greatawakening.win)
N-C-S-W-I-C
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
it is treason.
Pelosi had constitutional powers to deal with a rogue or mentally unstable executive, and she used them all -- 25th A, impeachment x 2, revoking or limiting the unlimited war powers she granted to predecessors -- all failed.
because they were plainly political.
if she truly believed such there was such a grave risk for Trump to have military powers, why did she reauthorized and expand NDAA every year under Trump?
in 2020, when Trump vetoed the colossal bill Pelosi sent over, Pelosi called it an act of staggering recklessness that harms our troops, endangers our security and undermines the will of the bipartisan Congress.
the only proposed presidential limits from Congress were to restrict the President from authorizing offensive strikes on Iran, and withdrawing troops.
the best is this:
This would be sedition for Piglosi and outright treason for Milley.
I am sick of seeing shit like this go unanswered.
Why should they care if they violate the Constitution? Waaaaay more likely to get filthy rich and do whatever they want than to be held accountable. There’s no fear