In light of what just happened in CA, is 2020+ safe guarded?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Eh, gotta side with him on this one, "safeguarded" should mean that fraud would be stopped, not that they just watch it happen and collect evidence...
We have plenty of evident from 2020, there was 0 need for more, evidence is not the problem, getting said evidence in front of more eyes, and having the justice system act upon it is the problem.. this didn't solve either.
I spent a week looking through video footage and getting hundreds of little video snippets of votes switching and whatnot after November 3rd, it was a huge effort coordinated on TDW, nothing came out of it...
Not saying I agree with the "this pretty much confirms Q was a psyop" part though, it's just that safeguarded, should mean just that, safeguarded...
That may have been a valid assumption at the time, however that’s not what we’re seeing playing out. What we’re seeing is the fraud is being exposed and the fake news is in a full court rush to try and cover it up.
I disagree with this. Every time new evidence comes to light, the media is forced to address, even if that means they attempt to ignore it. But every wave of evidence release adds to the avalanche, our spreading the word gives more awareness, and it’s causing more states to want to do a forensic audit.