Scroll down a few pages to results and there's a line that says they believe only 1% of cases are reported.
Furthermore, the red pill I give normies is I ask them for what data stream is being used to determine safety over time of the vaccines. Either they say VAERS or I tell them. I also point that Healthcare providers are legally required to report adverse events to VAERS. They look at go *ackshually, here's a disclaimer from the CDC that VAERS is self reported and unverified! Deboooonked." So that begs the question... what continued tracking with follow up is the CDC doing to determine vaccine safety? The CDC says it's VAERS so if you're saying that's not good enough, then we have NO DATA monitoring safety.
Clinically trained reviewers have undertaken a detailed analysis of a sample of the early deaths reported in VAERS (250 out of the 1644 deaths recorded up to April 2021). The focus is on the extent to which the reports enable us to understand whether the vaccine genuinely caused or contributed to the deaths. Contrary to claims that most of these reports are made by lay-people and are hence clinically unreliable, we identified health service employees as the reporter in at least 67%. The sample contains only people vaccinated early in the programme, and hence is made up primarily of those who are elderly or with significant health conditions. Despite this, there were only 14% of the cases for which a vaccine reaction could be ruled out as a contributing factor in their death.
I do think the reporting percentage is dramatically higher for COVID-19. This is data on adults with an EUA, so more doctors are willing to believe there is a correlation.
I hate that journalists are so lazy that can't link to the study...
2009 Harvard study: https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system
Download the pdf report.
Scroll down a few pages to results and there's a line that says they believe only 1% of cases are reported.
Furthermore, the red pill I give normies is I ask them for what data stream is being used to determine safety over time of the vaccines. Either they say VAERS or I tell them. I also point that Healthcare providers are legally required to report adverse events to VAERS. They look at go *ackshually, here's a disclaimer from the CDC that VAERS is self reported and unverified! Deboooonked." So that begs the question... what continued tracking with follow up is the CDC doing to determine vaccine safety? The CDC says it's VAERS so if you're saying that's not good enough, then we have NO DATA monitoring safety.
Great follow up post realAnon!👈🏻 Thanks for the additional link and context!
You get a cat for that!
u/#catdance
No prob! Great post! Glad healthcare workers know this info too and are speaking up!
Yep it’s more like %0.01 reported.
Almost every MD I talk to doesn’t even know what VAERS is despite there being a wall mounted mention of it.
This is another good study to look at
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352837543_Analysis_of_COVID-19_vaccine_death_reports_from_the_Vaccine_Adverse_Events_Reporting_System_VAERS_Database_Interim_Results_and_Analysis
Clinically trained reviewers have undertaken a detailed analysis of a sample of the early deaths reported in VAERS (250 out of the 1644 deaths recorded up to April 2021). The focus is on the extent to which the reports enable us to understand whether the vaccine genuinely caused or contributed to the deaths. Contrary to claims that most of these reports are made by lay-people and are hence clinically unreliable, we identified health service employees as the reporter in at least 67%. The sample contains only people vaccinated early in the programme, and hence is made up primarily of those who are elderly or with significant health conditions. Despite this, there were only 14% of the cases for which a vaccine reaction could be ruled out as a contributing factor in their death.
Translation:
Despite this, there were 86% of the cases for which a vaccine reaction could be a contributing factor in their death.
Excellent points realAnon - causing more CogDis at every turn...
I would believe 5x or 10x. 1 percent is probably too low. But it's still totally fucked
Yeah I would wager deaths get reported more than other things.
The doctors report it only if they run their own practice.
Otherwise they report it to administrators who don’t input to VEARS as they don’t want bad publicity
If there are 100 times as many deaths by clot shot, then I think we would start to see that vital statistics death rate start to nudge up.
Yes, 600k deaths usually gets noticed
I believe 1% for childhood vaccines.
I do think the reporting percentage is dramatically higher for COVID-19. This is data on adults with an EUA, so more doctors are willing to believe there is a correlation.
GREAT QUESTION! What database are they using AND let’s see it so we all feel good about the vaxx!
Answer: it's VAERS. And no they are not following up.