Show me one time a "mistake" like this has ever been favorable to a Republican and maybe I'll give this the time of day. Every single time I've seen this happen it's favorable to Democrats. EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
Perhaps you're too young to remember George Bush winning a Presidency in a hotly-contested election that likely had some significant irregularities. That definitely went the GOP's way.
You know dude/dudette, sometimes you are further into left field than anyone else around here, as far as I can tell. :)
Which isn't a criticism, per se. It's just that you seem completely unsatisfied that people are largely boring and selfish, and manifest those behaviors in very predictable ways.
A boring, predictable world seems largely impossible to you. The bigger the problem seems to be, the bigger the cause MUST be. You seem unable to accept that big consequences can come from small causes.
So, in other words, you don't seem like much of a believe in chaos theory at all. The notion that a butterfly flapping its wings in Texas can cause a typhoon across the planet.
As I've said before, I do not use the term "conspiracy theorist" pejoratively. It's a person who has a theory that there is a conspiracy. Nothing inherently wrong with that.
And I have my own theories on how people tend to become "conspiracy theorists", because regardless of whether those conspiracies are proven to exist at some point or not, the same people who believe one conspiracy tend to believe in a lot of conspiracies.
I think being able to see pictures in clouds is a treasure of an ability, but it doesn't convince me that the clouds actually are forming those pictures. Just that you have an artistic mind capable of creating pictures in random data.
I'm curious, then. Do you actually have a personal deadline for this stuff? I know, nobody likes datefagging, but everyone here recognizes that Q is on a deadline of some sort, and if by November 2024 we don't see Democrats arrested and Trump back in office, then the Q plan isn't really materializing.
You don't have to tell me the details, but do you have a cutoff point in your own personal philosophy where you accept that Q isn't going to show back up? Because I can tell you I'll switch sides once I see The Storm, but that's easy for me. The Storm arriving will be loud and obvious. Arrests. Transfer of power. Gitmo. Whatever.
It's less easy and obvious to see that the Storm isn't actually coming if it's not. It's just going to be a day that you wake up and realize that you've been waiting for nothing, and everyone here at this point has to have at least entertained when that cutoff will be for them.
Best you can come up with for an example is over 20 years old and you can't even point out a specific irregularity, just "likely had" them. Pretty convincing, got me there bud. I'm a believer. /s
Oh, I have no intention of convincing you of anything. I’m not here to change minds. Just to understand how your minds are made up in the way they have been.
Show me one time a "mistake" like this has ever been favorable to a Republican and maybe I'll give this the time of day. Every single time I've seen this happen it's favorable to Democrats. EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
Perhaps you're too young to remember George Bush winning a Presidency in a hotly-contested election that likely had some significant irregularities. That definitely went the GOP's way.
You know dude/dudette, sometimes you are further into left field than anyone else around here, as far as I can tell. :)
Which isn't a criticism, per se. It's just that you seem completely unsatisfied that people are largely boring and selfish, and manifest those behaviors in very predictable ways.
A boring, predictable world seems largely impossible to you. The bigger the problem seems to be, the bigger the cause MUST be. You seem unable to accept that big consequences can come from small causes.
So, in other words, you don't seem like much of a believe in chaos theory at all. The notion that a butterfly flapping its wings in Texas can cause a typhoon across the planet.
As I've said before, I do not use the term "conspiracy theorist" pejoratively. It's a person who has a theory that there is a conspiracy. Nothing inherently wrong with that.
And I have my own theories on how people tend to become "conspiracy theorists", because regardless of whether those conspiracies are proven to exist at some point or not, the same people who believe one conspiracy tend to believe in a lot of conspiracies.
I think being able to see pictures in clouds is a treasure of an ability, but it doesn't convince me that the clouds actually are forming those pictures. Just that you have an artistic mind capable of creating pictures in random data.
I'm curious, then. Do you actually have a personal deadline for this stuff? I know, nobody likes datefagging, but everyone here recognizes that Q is on a deadline of some sort, and if by November 2024 we don't see Democrats arrested and Trump back in office, then the Q plan isn't really materializing.
You don't have to tell me the details, but do you have a cutoff point in your own personal philosophy where you accept that Q isn't going to show back up? Because I can tell you I'll switch sides once I see The Storm, but that's easy for me. The Storm arriving will be loud and obvious. Arrests. Transfer of power. Gitmo. Whatever.
It's less easy and obvious to see that the Storm isn't actually coming if it's not. It's just going to be a day that you wake up and realize that you've been waiting for nothing, and everyone here at this point has to have at least entertained when that cutoff will be for them.
Best you can come up with for an example is over 20 years old and you can't even point out a specific irregularity, just "likely had" them. Pretty convincing, got me there bud. I'm a believer. /s
Oh, I have no intention of convincing you of anything. I’m not here to change minds. Just to understand how your minds are made up in the way they have been.
Well, no one really wants you to be here. You're dishonest and kinda trashy.
That’s making the assumption that RINO Bush and the GOP were good! Bush winning was still communism winning, regardless if it was Bush or Gore.
How about it goes the way of the communist every time? That seems the most accurate, to me.
Eh, you and I are going to disagree on what actually constitutes a "communist." Do you just want to stick with anti-Trumper or something?
Are you implying you think the Bush’s weren’t a part of this cabal’s communist attempted take-over?
Huh?