Please read this post first for context. I had posted this as comment there, but thought it needs a separate post as there will be more digs, no doubt.
Lets consider Eric Schmidt (possibly Tech Executive-1):
Timeline in Google (Possibly Internet Company-1):
CEO : 2001 - 2011
Executive Chairman of Google: 2011 - 2017 Dec 21
Other companies: (He had his finger in a lot of pies, but I think these two companies are interesting)
Investor in The Groundwork (Internet Company-2 ?), a start-up company associated with HRC campaign. Most of the Groundwork's employees are back-end software developers with experience at tech firms like Netflix, DreamHost, Zalando, and Google. Guessing its like a place to siphon data from Google/FB/Twitter etc and keep it in a separate backend to do data analytics
Schmidt is an investor in Timshel (Internet Company-3 ?, another start up company associated with HRC campaign. Timshel is the parent company of The Groundwork. The company seems to be defunct, my guess is, its a second layer shell between Google and Groundwork.
Possibly his involvement with HRC Campaign started in June 2014 with the creation of Groundwork.
In March 2, 2016, looks like he was made the chairman of the DoD Innovation Advisory Board by Ash Carter, Obama's SecDef - was this his reward ?
His leaving Google in Dec 21, 2017 is not a coincidence, considering Durham started in Oct 28 2017 (along with first Q drop), and Q has posted a lot about Eric Schmidt. He was involved in NK, Myanmar - all [DS] hubs.
Here is an excerpt from a Slate article:
Alphabet is the parent company of Google, whose online empire Schmidt presided over as CEO and executive chairman for 17 years of unrelenting growth
17 years at Google? Can you even make this up ?
22b – Google/Alphabet is the only company, outside of ISPs who run DNS services in 2016 that also owned other companies.
I'd say it's either Google or an ISP.
back when Q was posting, people were digging up a lot of links between several lawyers and high ranking officials (i.e. the Clintons), the alphabet swamp (Clowns-In-America), and a number of swamp companies. Anytime a lawsuit or inconvenient truth needed squashing - guess who was always there?
You know, I worked under Eric Schmidt (as in he was the CEO of the company I was at) before he went to Google. Its kind of surreal to think I was in the same room listening to him speak (nothing about him was impressive in anyway) and not realise that he is Evil Incarnate himself.
Small world. I would upvote that revelation a dozen times.
But also interesting. In a way, that confirms what I've been seeing for some time (having worked professionally in a half dozen companies, large and small). There's nothing special about a lot of the people who make it to the CEO chair. Of the ones I knew personally (in small companies), by far the best one started the company. One guy was purely a placeholder for the board. The others, meh.
But there was one thing I noticed with one of the large companies (> $5B) where I saw what was happening, but wasn't certain about the driving forces behind it until Q dropped a hint about Wallstreet. Without getting into too much detail, the conservative CEO, who did a lot to grow the company from almost nothing, retired (I suspect now several years early). Another CEO was brought in to do the Jack Welch thing (cuts). And then they brought in the liberal CEO, who is now showing his true colors. At the same time, the company stock seemed to follow the CEOs and their decisions much more closely than the company's financial performance. Everyone talks about "future performance", "market potential", etc, as the reason for the stock movement, but now it's clear that Wallstreet and some board members collude to remove conservatives from the upper ranks of large corporations to install their own controlled goons.
Oh absolutely. Every single stock price is controlled via AI using all the Wall Street illegalities that are coming to light.
You want to make a person big - just put him incharge and move the stock price up while putting some plausible cover in the media - and you have created gold.
As for my experience with ES, it always struck me as strange and I will tell you why. He came to Novell as a CEO when the company was on its way down the drain (after they sold Unixware - their crown jewell, but thats a different rabbit hole), and did nothing whatsoever to pull the company up in anyway. He basically did not even leave a mark on the company.
And within a couple years later, he was tapped to become the CEO of the hottest company? While the founders were pushed aside? And the founders accepted this without grumbling? It never added up.
I am pretty sure he served some purpose in Novell, whatever it was (perhaps destroying the company fully, I dont know) and he proved his loyalty to the Cabal so well that they put him in charge of their most important operation.
I just feel there is a lot more to dig here.
Novell was a well know tech company at the time. But when you're grooming someone for a position, many people don't look too closely at what they did (good or bad) during their tenure at previous companies. Easy to make an excuse - "it was too late for that place". But if we think about it, what if the real reason he was installed at Novell was for the golden parachute? i.e. "setting the hook"? I'm sure they had him in the bag by then, but having the money to travel with the "gang of thieves" to their "dens of horrors", makes it much easier for him to show up places as one of them, and be trusted with the next gig.