Off the road to the side? Or at least only block off a single side of the road. Not creating a massive wall that prevents people who have nothing to do with what they're protesting from going about their day and lives.
Ah. No.
Everyone in Melbourne has to do with this protest, since the rules effect the entire Victorian population. Melbourne is mostly locked down atm because of Andrews' insane rules. They'll also be locked out of healthcare, clubs, jobs, pubs, restaurants, retail, travel and schools if unvaccinated. So "go about their daily lives" is disrupted completely by Andrews' insane edicts.
Everyone in Victoria is effected by this and no one's daily lives are allowed to go back to normal regardless. The protest mirrors the problem.
BLM protests were about disruption for a questionable social issue. Blocking streets for them was not in direct protest of an mirrorable action. It's a false dichotomy to equate the two.
Your logic is flawed because you based it on a false premise to begin with.
What I meant is that the people they're blocking on the street are not the people they're protesting against. The random dude in his car in the photo, for example, didn't enact a bunch of tyrannical bullshit so why is he getting fucked over? He's already having his day-to-day screwed by the tyrannical government so why is double screwing him by blocking the street the correct action in the situation? It's already hard enough for people to do anything without other people blocking the street.
Rules for thee but not for me is what this sounds like to me. The rules only apply when they're convenient. When they aren't they're simply ignored. Sounds like the exact same way BLM thinks.
We have rules and laws for a reason. Blocking the streets while protesting is either okay or not okay. The reason is irrelevant and the rules apply to everybody the same. If it's allowed then BLM blocking the streets is fine. The only remaining problem was the violent nature of their "protests'.
To expand, It doesn't matter if your protest is valid or not (e.g. the people protesting in the OP vs BLM riots), blocking the streets only fucks over other people who did nothing wrong and may even agree with your protest. If you want to block a road that only the government (or whoever else you're protesting against) uses to prevent them from doing whatever they might be doing that's one thing, but why fuck over your fellow citizens by blocking the regular roads they use?
Off the road to the side? Or at least only block off a single side of the road. Not creating a massive wall that prevents people who have nothing to do with what they're protesting from going about their day and lives.
Ah. No. Everyone in Melbourne has to do with this protest, since the rules effect the entire Victorian population. Melbourne is mostly locked down atm because of Andrews' insane rules. They'll also be locked out of healthcare, clubs, jobs, pubs, restaurants, retail, travel and schools if unvaccinated. So "go about their daily lives" is disrupted completely by Andrews' insane edicts.
Everyone in Victoria is effected by this and no one's daily lives are allowed to go back to normal regardless. The protest mirrors the problem.
BLM protests were about disruption for a questionable social issue. Blocking streets for them was not in direct protest of an mirrorable action. It's a false dichotomy to equate the two.
Your logic is flawed because you based it on a false premise to begin with.
What I meant is that the people they're blocking on the street are not the people they're protesting against. The random dude in his car in the photo, for example, didn't enact a bunch of tyrannical bullshit so why is he getting fucked over? He's already having his day-to-day screwed by the tyrannical government so why is double screwing him by blocking the street the correct action in the situation? It's already hard enough for people to do anything without other people blocking the street.
Rules for thee but not for me is what this sounds like to me. The rules only apply when they're convenient. When they aren't they're simply ignored. Sounds like the exact same way BLM thinks.
We have rules and laws for a reason. Blocking the streets while protesting is either okay or not okay. The reason is irrelevant and the rules apply to everybody the same. If it's allowed then BLM blocking the streets is fine. The only remaining problem was the violent nature of their "protests'.
It's hard for you but hopefully when you grow up it gets worse.now run on home before its dark.
That isn't a counterargument.
To expand, It doesn't matter if your protest is valid or not (e.g. the people protesting in the OP vs BLM riots), blocking the streets only fucks over other people who did nothing wrong and may even agree with your protest. If you want to block a road that only the government (or whoever else you're protesting against) uses to prevent them from doing whatever they might be doing that's one thing, but why fuck over your fellow citizens by blocking the regular roads they use?