What does the "science" say?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (63)
sorted by:
They all died from an ADE (antibody dependent enhancement). This is a severe immune response when encountering the wild type virus after getting the vaccines. There is some evidence to support that this might be happening with the current vaccines. I think the "Delta Variant" may be hiding some of these deaths.
But that is not data, and that has NOTHING to do with the topic of my post, which was specifically an address on unfounded fears of infertility or other fertility problems. THAT is based purely on fear mongering (with ALL the evidence so far).
https://www.bitchute.com/video/lnr5zv0o1CVn/
Give this a watch, and tell me what you think. It's more than just ADE, which I do agree is going on.
The Spike Proteins ARE the disease.
Except at the end, what is talked about in that video is a short term effect. The ADE is a long term effect. They are completely different scopes of problems.
The video talks about the S protein "getting in the way" because they are sticking out. I have a big problem with that idea. First, they are way too small relative to the size of a capillary or blood cell, second, all cells have all sorts of proteins just like the S protein sticking out.
I think there may be something to the blood clots happening in the capillaries. In fact, I think its likely. Blood cells spend more time squeezing through a capillary than they do flowing through veins and arteries, so if there is going to be an interaction with blood cell/vasculature or blood cell/blood cell it is entirely probable it would happen in the capillaries, but whatever the reason is, I don't think that part of it was correct. It just doesn't make sense for the reasons I listed. That doesn't mean its not the reason, but to me, it makes no sense, so data would be needed to show it before I will consider it.
Having said that, I mostly agree with the other things he said. I also disagree with his assessment of "permanent damage," though that is an argument with the larger medical community that I have.
I also see why you said "dead in three years." Those reactions he was talking about are rare. I do think they have happened. It does seem a plausible long term effect, but the data suggests it will be a rarity, not a common reaction. Just like "long term covid" is very rare according to the data (they are likely related reactions).
As for the S protein being the disease, that is true for sure, though it is not the only problem with either SARS-CoV-2 or the vaccines it is probably the biggest one in both cases (though the autoimmune problems with the vaccine may be equal or even worse to S protein problems).