No one changes who they are on a whim like that, if you believe she is "based", you are easily fooled. If she was breaking the programming as was stated, where is the breakdown, where are the signs of mental fatigue, signs of odd behavior. Christians are about truth, not just conveniently Christian as a lot are. This gal's outward action is akin to the publican praying on the corner so everyone see's how holy they are.
Again if she is so based, where is the track record? Aside from a few twitter posts, what has she done that is so based? If she is breaking her programming where are the signs? There is a lot of info and video on people breaking MK/Monarch programming and what she is doing doesn't fit any of the criteria, on the other hand it give the impression that she is still tightly held by her handlers. The fact she is saying precisely all the right things at the right time should be reason for questionability, the fact that so many are swayed by her "conversion" is rather concerning. If John Kerry starts saying tomorrow that is a pro-Trump person, you would believe him, or Kamala, or any of the drones on CNN?
People deserve a chance to change of course, assuming otherwise is foolish. But only a child thinks a person changes in a blink or overnight simply b/c they say so. This is supposed to be a board of researchers and truth seekers, not sensationalists.
No one changes who they are on a whim like that, if you believe she is "based", you are easily fooled. If she was breaking the programming as was stated, where is the breakdown, where are the signs of mental fatigue, signs of odd behavior. Christians are about truth, not just conveniently Christian as a lot are. This gal's outward action is akin to the publican praying on the corner so everyone see's how holy they are.
Again if she is so based, where is the track record? Aside from a few twitter posts, what has she done that is so based? If she is breaking her programming where are the signs? There is a lot of info and video on people breaking MK/Monarch programming and what she is doing doesn't fit any of the criteria, on the other hand it give the impression that she is still tightly held by her handlers. The fact she is saying precisely all the right things at the right time should be reason for questionability, the fact that so many are swayed by her "conversion" is rather concerning. If John Kerry starts saying tomorrow that is a pro-Trump person, you would believe him, or Kamala, or any of the drones on CNN?
People deserve a chance to change of course, assuming otherwise is foolish. But only a child thinks a person changes in a blink or overnight simply b/c they say so. This is supposed to be a board of researchers and truth seekers, not sensationalists.
Get behind me, Satan.