I'm glad someone else got here before I did, because when I point stuff like this out it just tends to get me accusations of believing the lies of the MSM.
It's perfectly fine to tell someone you want them to watch Steven Kirsch call into the FDA meeting and listen to his message to them because you believe him.
It's not accurate to claim that the FDA in any way endorsed this position. Kirsch is not part of the FDA. He was telling them he protested the position they took.
I've already had to wade through a deluge of headlines elsewhere of people who either didn't watch this speech or who did and are misrepresenting it claim that the FDA admitted the vaccine is killing people 5:1, and it simply isn't accurate to make a claim that the FDA admitted that. Someone protesting against the FDA made that claim.
A lot of people here like to pat themselves on the backs for being "critical thinkers," but they just post clickbait or upvote threads without first understanding them or even reading past the title.
Question, do r/qultHQ think we are crazy, misinformed, uneducated, or just dumb? Are you aware that there is a difference between a Qpost and an anon and that just because an anon says something doesn't mean others belive it. I am not sure if Q is some big player, but I do belive that this world if run by corrupt and evil people.
I don't really speak for the sub. I just do some modding for them when I'm over there. I can only speak for myself.
I agree that the world has some very corrupt, evil, and powerful people in it. That's not at all challenging to believe. Nor is it even difficult to believe some of those people are/could be pedophiles. This isn't a challenging position to hold, and I think a lot of liberals would agree.
If Q was SOLELY about being anti-pedophile or anti-corruption, you'd have a much more diverse group of members around here.
But it's not that. From the outside, Q honestly just feels like an attempt to create a narrative in which Donald Trump can be this strategic 5D-chess playing genius, but never actually demonstrate any clear evidence that he IS one. Instead, he plays optics, "weak when you are strong" type stuff, while a faceless entity who this board curiously refuses to ever identify is the actual brains behind the operation. And no, you haven't lost the election, it just LOOKS that way, because the operation being used to save the world is so immensely complex and secret that only the smartest of us can actually see what's really happening.
If I were going to "speak for the sub", I would imagine that would be the message. That Q seems like an extremely complicated version of "Bernie can still win" memes. People who refuse to believe that Donald Trump was capable of being as disliked as he would need to be to legitimately lose the election to someone as boring as Joe Biden and to present the kind of optics that plagued him for his entire Presidency.
It can't be the result of Trump's promises and boasts being presented as a far more valuable currency than he had the resources to back up. It must be something far more subtle and complicated.
I personally don't think most of you are significantly divergent from the average population in intelligence. I can't speak to your education levels because I don't know. I also don't think you're necessarily crazy. I think the psychology of what it takes to believe in something like Q is enormously more complicated than almost anyone here or on the outside actually believes, and that's what I'm interested in understanding.
I'm glad someone else got here before I did, because when I point stuff like this out it just tends to get me accusations of believing the lies of the MSM.
It's perfectly fine to tell someone you want them to watch Steven Kirsch call into the FDA meeting and listen to his message to them because you believe him.
It's not accurate to claim that the FDA in any way endorsed this position. Kirsch is not part of the FDA. He was telling them he protested the position they took.
I've already had to wade through a deluge of headlines elsewhere of people who either didn't watch this speech or who did and are misrepresenting it claim that the FDA admitted the vaccine is killing people 5:1, and it simply isn't accurate to make a claim that the FDA admitted that. Someone protesting against the FDA made that claim.
Thank you! 🙏
A lot of people here like to pat themselves on the backs for being "critical thinkers," but they just post clickbait or upvote threads without first understanding them or even reading past the title.
Question, do r/qultHQ think we are crazy, misinformed, uneducated, or just dumb? Are you aware that there is a difference between a Qpost and an anon and that just because an anon says something doesn't mean others belive it. I am not sure if Q is some big player, but I do belive that this world if run by corrupt and evil people.
I don't really speak for the sub. I just do some modding for them when I'm over there. I can only speak for myself.
I agree that the world has some very corrupt, evil, and powerful people in it. That's not at all challenging to believe. Nor is it even difficult to believe some of those people are/could be pedophiles. This isn't a challenging position to hold, and I think a lot of liberals would agree.
If Q was SOLELY about being anti-pedophile or anti-corruption, you'd have a much more diverse group of members around here.
But it's not that. From the outside, Q honestly just feels like an attempt to create a narrative in which Donald Trump can be this strategic 5D-chess playing genius, but never actually demonstrate any clear evidence that he IS one. Instead, he plays optics, "weak when you are strong" type stuff, while a faceless entity who this board curiously refuses to ever identify is the actual brains behind the operation. And no, you haven't lost the election, it just LOOKS that way, because the operation being used to save the world is so immensely complex and secret that only the smartest of us can actually see what's really happening.
If I were going to "speak for the sub", I would imagine that would be the message. That Q seems like an extremely complicated version of "Bernie can still win" memes. People who refuse to believe that Donald Trump was capable of being as disliked as he would need to be to legitimately lose the election to someone as boring as Joe Biden and to present the kind of optics that plagued him for his entire Presidency.
It can't be the result of Trump's promises and boasts being presented as a far more valuable currency than he had the resources to back up. It must be something far more subtle and complicated.
I personally don't think most of you are significantly divergent from the average population in intelligence. I can't speak to your education levels because I don't know. I also don't think you're necessarily crazy. I think the psychology of what it takes to believe in something like Q is enormously more complicated than almost anyone here or on the outside actually believes, and that's what I'm interested in understanding.
Thanks for your input. If you'd like I can give you my perspective and why I am here, and my personal take on Q. Just LMK.