Everyone who keeps talking about "slow walking" the Project Veritas videos obviously has never read Righteous Indignation and knows nothing about what Andrew Breitbart taught James O'Keefe.
You have to release the videos slowly. If you do it all at once, it's easy to ignore and cover. If you release kind of a nothing at first, it gets mocked on the news. Then you release another. And another. And another. And pretty soon, the news has to cover it. It becomes too much to ignore.
So yes, it will be slow. But it won't be that slow. My guess is is will be two weeks total at max. But not the same two weeks as the audit.
This would be the case if we were the target audience, but we're not.
It's the normies who need to hear and see this info the most. And we live in an instant gratification world, like it or not. So the initial drop can't be a dud that they'll easily pass off as a nothing burger. Because they'll lose interest.
I speak from experience, as that is precisely what happened last fall with some normie friends. They lost total interest in what O'Keefe shared in subsequent drops because the 1st one was lackluster.
Remember, normies get their news from MSM. All it takes is for the narrative to be, 'that was lame, there's no teeth to this whistleblower claim' for most normies to tune it out and ignore subsequent drops.
Don't get me wrong, I love Andrew Breitbart. But the slow approach worked better for a different time.
Everyone who keeps talking about "slow walking" the Project Veritas videos obviously has never read Righteous Indignation and knows nothing about what Andrew Breitbart taught James O'Keefe.
You have to release the videos slowly. If you do it all at once, it's easy to ignore and cover. If you release kind of a nothing at first, it gets mocked on the news. Then you release another. And another. And another. And pretty soon, the news has to cover it. It becomes too much to ignore.
So yes, it will be slow. But it won't be that slow. My guess is is will be two weeks total at max. But not the same two weeks as the audit.
I agree with you, to a point.
This would be the case if we were the target audience, but we're not.
It's the normies who need to hear and see this info the most. And we live in an instant gratification world, like it or not. So the initial drop can't be a dud that they'll easily pass off as a nothing burger. Because they'll lose interest.
I speak from experience, as that is precisely what happened last fall with some normie friends. They lost total interest in what O'Keefe shared in subsequent drops because the 1st one was lackluster.
Remember, normies get their news from MSM. All it takes is for the narrative to be, 'that was lame, there's no teeth to this whistleblower claim' for most normies to tune it out and ignore subsequent drops.
Don't get me wrong, I love Andrew Breitbart. But the slow approach worked better for a different time.