A solid read from a federal prosecutor, why the Sussmann indictment is YUGE. This isn't hopium, its hope.
(shipwreckedcrew.substack.com)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (75)
sorted by:
Nobody here has credentials. They can say they have them, but they don't. We are anons.
The only credentials you have here is if you bring an intelligent, logical comment to the forum that has the proofs to back them up. That is the litmus test. If you can't do that, even if you are the a mega-brained-lawyer (in this case), you might as well be just another pleb on the street.
I could say the same about a lot of the resumes I’ve sifted through.
But I’ll concede your point, if for no other reason than we are getting too far off topic.
The crux of my point was, you cannot dismiss that it appears attorney-client privilege was breached just because billing and time are sometimes not considered privileged. The indictment and the article both reference emails Sussmann (the attorney) was sending his clients. If Durham has those, then the article appears to be correct.
Correct about the resume thing. Personally I suck in interviews. However my current job gave me an assignment as part of the process, and I impressed the hell out them with skill.
Logic and skill conquers all.
As to your point: fair point.
I'm great at interviews, I never study prerehearsed questions.
While I am skillful at my job, impressing in an interview in a way that is natural and genuine goes along way in your consideration as a recommended candidate for the job.
I always did well in interviews. I've never actually filled out an application for any job I ever had. I just went in and said you need a worker, I want a job, and I am qualified. Then we would talk a bit, and I was hired. In my last job, I was on the clock about an hour after I walked in the building and kept the job until I retired.