Can someone explain to me how the NIH... - The Great Awakening

Can someone explain to me how the NIH... 🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬

posted 3 years ago by PaNix 3 years ago by PaNix +425 / -1

How does the national Institute of Health continue to get away with lying profusely and continuing to say that ivermectin has no clinical trials as to its efficacy regarding covid 19 as prophylactic as well as early stage therapeutic, even late stage recovery numbers are mucb more promising. Some 90ish countries primarily use IVM as a front line treatment. One of the provinces in India that was previously very sick and leading the world in Cases is now covid free. Countries are stopping the vaccine and starting IVM. El salvador gives it free of charge as a prophylactic. Japan uses it as their #1 weapon. It looks like vax vears numbers are grossly underreported.

Anyway, how do they continue to get away with this, and what can we do? Ok, vax companies have immunity for their BS. But on the flip side, how do we get NIH to acknowledge that the numbers in these studies are even better than thair BS vax numbers. ISREAL IS NOT HELPING THE PHARMA INDUSTRY. 13 days of protection? I mean this shit is crazy. We need to go after the NIH and the CDC but how?

What is the endstate here? Even after we can take our eyes off the audits which is our duty.. how do we stop this vax madness and get IVM worldwide like it needs to be. Its not like money is an issue. Well it is, but on the wrong side. Its too cheap

The ceo of Pfizer is one of the most powerful people in the world. He is literally getting a chunk out of every dollar spent on the planet right now if you think about it. If you cant go places without the vax and you can't spend money without getting it. Then pharma is getting a chunk of every dollar spent on the planet.

Edit: thanks for sticky, I tried to fix typos: my phone has a small screen so I did the best I could. o7

74 comments

74 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (74)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– EUssr 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I doubt they'd actually write it like that... then again the CDC quotes an NIH paper that states that 50% of the patients treated with Remdesivir for Ebola died to legitimize Remdesivir for Covid-19. In other words, they openly say that they are murdering Covid-19 ICU patients. So maybe they're transparent about their medical discrimination as well.

There have been rumors and unverified whistleblowing nurses that stated that they give Ivermectin to vaccinated but not unvaccinated. But who knows how accurate that is.

permalink parent save report block reply