How does the national Institute of Health continue to get away with lying profusely and continuing to say that ivermectin has no clinical trials as to its efficacy regarding covid 19 as prophylactic as well as early stage therapeutic, even late stage recovery numbers are mucb more promising. Some 90ish countries primarily use IVM as a front line treatment. One of the provinces in India that was previously very sick and leading the world in Cases is now covid free. Countries are stopping the vaccine and starting IVM. El salvador gives it free of charge as a prophylactic. Japan uses it as their #1 weapon. It looks like vax vears numbers are grossly underreported.
Anyway, how do they continue to get away with this, and what can we do? Ok, vax companies have immunity for their BS. But on the flip side, how do we get NIH to acknowledge that the numbers in these studies are even better than thair BS vax numbers. ISREAL IS NOT HELPING THE PHARMA INDUSTRY. 13 days of protection? I mean this shit is crazy. We need to go after the NIH and the CDC but how?
What is the endstate here? Even after we can take our eyes off the audits which is our duty.. how do we stop this vax madness and get IVM worldwide like it needs to be. Its not like money is an issue. Well it is, but on the wrong side. Its too cheap
The ceo of Pfizer is one of the most powerful people in the world. He is literally getting a chunk out of every dollar spent on the planet right now if you think about it. If you cant go places without the vax and you can't spend money without getting it. Then pharma is getting a chunk of every dollar spent on the planet.
Edit: thanks for sticky, I tried to fix typos: my phone has a small screen so I did the best I could. o7
Ivermectin is approved for use for covid on their website: https://www.bitchute.com/video/z7wvB9hSOrUj/
Only if you're vaccinated with a bReaKtHroUgh InFecTIoN.
Wait seriously? I haven't read the cdc authorization. But calling it now. There is no way the cdc says you can only take ivm if your vaxd.
Australia said that, not the CDC.
There was a video on here yesterday of an Aussie nurse saying that the vaxxed are given Ivermectin while the unvaxxed given nothing
Close....the unvaxx'd are given a vent until their lungs blow out and they die. Remdesivir speeds things along by destroying their kidneys first.
Wait did they say that? This is what sucks its like a giant game of telephone, but humanity is at stake. I thought a nurse IN Australia said that was happening in the hospital she works at? Is that PUBLIC policy in Australia, and not a secret-so-we-can-fudge-the-numbers-to-make-the-vax-look-better-policy?
I doubt they'd actually write it like that... then again the CDC quotes an NIH paper that states that 50% of the patients treated with Remdesivir for Ebola died to legitimize Remdesivir for Covid-19. In other words, they openly say that they are murdering Covid-19 ICU patients. So maybe they're transparent about their medical discrimination as well.
There have been rumors and unverified whistleblowing nurses that stated that they give Ivermectin to vaccinated but not unvaccinated. But who knows how accurate that is.
But why didn't they have a link to what they discussed & showed on the video? Found this while trying to find the NIH list they talked about on the video.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248252/
Edit to add this link ...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33278625/
And another, this one is a bit long, but has lots of good data supporting Ivermectin ...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/
This might be what you are looking for, according to NIH:
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/tables/table-2e/
Treatments that are approved or under evaluation.
Remdesivir
Ivermectin
Thanks fren!